back on topic.....spitting cum out after i've worked so hard to extract it from the source would be just plain sinful!  and i think it's also kinda rude to the man. if u dont wanna swallow, at least just back off and dodge it! but dont spit!

I do claim to be queen victoria!

after thte previous post, I'll call you anything you want!

where can you get HUGE grains of salt??  I've got some HUGE greenbeans and I think they need a little more flavor.

guess I just won't eat green beans again either 

So which do you guys think we're with here:

1) Frat boys with access to "Lynettes" pictures

2) Common computer in a nursing home

3) Common computer in a prison somewhere in California

4) Someone who's good at spinning a half-believable story, but not as good as
    we are at unraveling it.

Yet again, Lynette attacks the attacker instead of disproving anything I wrote.

lynette,

just out of sheer curiousity, what is your sister's screenname on here?

I wasn't even gonna start in on this but wtf:
I'm Canadian but thanks for generalizing all of us as Americans and all men who question you on this board as self centred in an attempt to rationalize your what you've been doing. You're the one frauding all of us (men and women included) yet somehow WE'RE the assholes for it.  I guess I should have a firmer grasp of who I am inside. Again you project your dishonesty to us...if we were better people we'd see the big picture, right. You should work in politics.
As for your pics, it is really tough sometimes to tell if you're insinuating that the picture is of you. Contrary to popular belief not all of us perverts at this site have the vast porn library that you seem to, and these "public pics"you refer to may not appear as apparent to the casual observer as you seem to think. But you're right, the pics that AREN'T you, you never claim them to be of you, you just leave the matter a little cloudy at times. Forgiveable I suppose.
You say that our male egos are bruised by your ruse? I don't really care when it comes down to it, but the problem with your posts from the beginning is how inconsistent they were. They didn't seem to be written by a 25 year old and the claims and story never pieced together. And then when someone calls you on it, you either don't respond, respond much later when you've thought of a story, ior change the topic and attack them as the liar. Then when there's no way out you say, oh yeah I never claimed to be ONE person?!?! Well you never claimed NOT to be Queen Victoria either so let's get your crown!
I think there are some very basic assumptions people make when you post here. One is that you're at least somewhat in the ball park as far as who you are, your age, how many of you there are. A little emebellishment here and there, who gives a shit. But you blow the lids off the hyperbole department accross the board. Call you anything but honest??? I don't know anyone but a moron who would take anything you say from now on without a HUGE grain of salt. You give no reason to think otherwise.
You should feel accomplished though, 2 people (hell maybe more) have managed to be almost as interesting and enetertaining as one real person.
If the previous post was written by Lucky, then my apologies to Lynette.  

lynette,

just out of sheer curiousity, what is your sister's screenname on here?

I do claim to be queen victoria!

Lynette,

Once again, you use exaggeration to digress from the real subject here - the fact that you feel the need to lie on a boob forum to make yourself feel good about yourself.  Of course you will not admit to this, so you create some ridiculous story to cover up.  It's funny that you advise people to go to RMR to clear things up - your integrity was questioned just as much there as it is here.  In fact, many people on that site thought you and "Lucky" were the same person.  Here's the problem, Lynette - I can tell the difference between a 28 year old woman and a 43 year old woman.  You look like a 43 year old woman.  You can't get around that.

You have not "bruised my male ego" in any way.  I posted initially for one reason only: sheer irritation with your pathetic attempt at an alter-ego.  I don't believe for a second that you and your "sister" Lucky are both posting here.  I think you couldn't get your story straight.

Like someone else said, I no longer care - you're too stubborn or emotionally invested or whatever to admit to the truth.  It's sad, really.

And by the way - did you think I wouldn't notice that this is the ONLY "self explanatory" picture of a blonde?  Funny, it's the ONLY one that doesn't have long black hair and the face cut out.  I guess that's just a coincidence.

One more thing, Lynette - you claim to have earned a marketing degree from UCLA at 21 - did you even check to see that UCLA doesn't offer an undergraduate marketing degree?  You would have to go to their MBA program for that - or did you earn your Master's at 21?

Lynette,

Once again, you use exaggeration to digress from the real subject here - the fact that you feel the need to lie on a boob forum to make yourself feel good about yourself.  Of course you will not admit to this, so you create some ridiculous story to cover up.  It's funny that you advise people to go to RMR to clear things up - your integrity was questioned just as much there as it is here.  In fact, many people on that site thought you and "Lucky" were the same person.  Here's the problem, Lynette - I can tell the difference between a 28 year old woman and a 43 year old woman.  You look like a 43 year old woman.  You can't get around that.

You have not "bruised my male ego" in any way.  I posted initially for one reason only: sheer irritation with your pathetic attempt at an alter-ego.  I don't believe for a second that you and your "sister" Lucky are both posting here.  I think you couldn't get your story straight.

Like someone else said, I no longer care - you're too stubborn or emotionally invested or whatever to admit to the truth.  It's sad, really.

And by the way - did you think I wouldn't notice that this is the ONLY "self explanatory" picture of a blonde?  Funny, it's the ONLY one that doesn't have long black hair and the face cut out.  I guess that's just a coincidence.

One more thing, Lynette - you claim to have earned a marketing degree from UCLA at 21 - did you even check to see that UCLA doesn't offer an undergraduate marketing degree?  You would have to go to their MBA program for that - or did you earn your Master's at 21?

OK, I haven't been around for a few and just caught up on all of this. I don't have alot to add that hasn't already been said, but the above quote is just freakin creepy.
Who are you, Cecil Adams?

ok.... if your sister's screenname is "lynette" and this was posted under "lynette"... then what is YOUR screenname?  because you said you posted on hers sometimes and she posted on yours... i'm not trying to antagonize, i'm just really trying to figure out what you meant

I wasn't even gonna start in on this but wtf:
I don't know anyone but a moron who would take anything you say from now on without a HUGE grain of salt.

I do claim to be queen victoria!

Ok, you just made up my mind as to what I should be thinking of you. There's absolutely nothing about what I've said that is rediculus. You're calling me a lier and I could just as easily make the same alligation about anyone here. You are crazy, and the fact that part of protecting my anonimity by using UCLA raher than another west coast school is a decision I made a long time ago. BTW, I don't see any nude pictures of you on any of these threads. I now truly believe that you're just another pervert frequenting boob sites with an ax to grind. The only thing sad around here is your unbelievable ego not permitting you to see further than your nose. And, many people on RMR DID think Lucky and I were the same person until she started posting pictures of the both of us together in the same photos Mr. right. And you have the nerve to suggest that I can't let it go due to some insecurity problem. You're either a ery sad little single man who needs to be here for some wierd sexual outlet,[B] or you're married (in which case, you're even sadder, maybe even sick). And the picture I posted of the blonde was for comic relief you funny little guy. Frankly, I'm really surprised that got by you, but you're SO hung-up on not admitting the possibility that you've made a mountain out of a molehill and a mistake in  all this you can't see the forest for the trees. Like I said before... "Believe what you will" this is only a tittie site and not a courtroom (except for those with minds small enough to take all this seriously.[/b]

You look like a fool - and you want us to stop reminding you of it.  It's okay, Sybil.  As I've already said, I know you'll continue the ridiculous charade instead of admitting the truth.  It is quite interesting to watch, but it's starting to get boring. 

Here's a piece of advice - reread Closeup's post of pointers for making your pathetic story more believable.  Maybe it will work on the next site.

well bo, i don't have a crown for you... but i'm pretty sure i have a necklace you might enjoy 

WTF?!   am i the only one who's confuzzled?! or is it cos i aint been around for a while?

Man I read all the arguing in the past few pages and I have come to one conclusion.......

.... I like girls who let me shoot on their face and in their mouth.. i dont care if they spit or swallow. 

I also enjoy shooting while they have my cock enveloped like an ever lasting Gob Stopper. Again they can spit or swallow as long as they run their tongue over my head a little

back on topic.....spitting cum out after i've worked so hard to extract it from the source would be just plain sinful!  and i think it's also kinda rude to the man. if u dont wanna swallow, at least just back off and dodge it! but dont spit!

well, being queen victoria, i can get away with some shit.  there WAS  a time i was mad at him, so i walked in the bedroom where he was laying down, yanked his pants off, sucked him till he was hard (no, he wasnt just laying there hard already, have to state that cause someone in this crowd WILL wonder), continued sucking till he was just about to cum, then i stopped and walked back out of the room.


but i STILL DIDNT SPIT!

Nice work. These explanations of hers are really starting to border on the absurd. I'm going to state for the last time. Lynette, your credibility is absolutely zero on this site. Keep posting titty pictures, if that's what you want to do. But quit trying to explain the unexplainable. You've gone past the point of looking desperate and foolish. If tomorrow, someone else is "using your computer and your identity" pass the word on that the bullshit has been piled on too deep and you can't shovel it fast enough. By the way, (I'm actually a suburban housewife who lives in Alaska and has two kids)

Well I'd say that those last few  posts cleared everything right up. Gnappy's an asshole, Mimo is a pervert and I'm a fucking moron. I just knew there was a logical explanation. Thanks for explaining it so that all us ignorant fools could understand.But, explain to us idiots again, what purpose was served by pretending to be someone else, even if the someone else was your sister. I didn't quite catch the reasoning behind those actions.

well we new the above ,, I guess the reasoning from someone that truly doesnt give a fuck would be , cause it helped you guys have something to talk about for the last 3 pages in a thread  titled  SPIT OR SWALLOW  ...... 

the ends justify a retarded means?
in the same way you could say crime makes the nightly news more interesting.
so what?

In fact that was exactly what I assumed lynette's next line of defense would be.

She tries to keep up some fake life on a message board, then denies when confronted. When her story is picked apart like a chicken at Delta Burke's dinner table she attacks everyone else then conveniently concocts some surreal explanation for things. When that's gone she'll say, I entertained you all, it was plan all along and you fell for it. Riiiiiiight. I think you're now posing as a troll only because you have about zero credibility left. You may say you're 29 but your granny hands gave you away a long time ago. You still look good for your age, but 29(28 or 25 or whatever your changing birthdate is) pleeeease. Your penchant for exposing yourself to underage school boys seems all the creepier.
And that is all®

Gnappy I think you replied to the wrong quote .. 

cause it helped you guys have something to talk about for the last 3 pages

Lynette,

I've said it and many others have said it - you cannot address the real issue, so you go on the attack.  Nothing you say is ridiculous?  Every response you've given is ridiculous.  You're protecting your anonymity?  Just a few posts up you told everyone your full name - Lynette Richards.  You need to change the name of the school you went to but you'll give out your full name?  This is ridiculous.

How about NOT offering the detailed information instead.  You've spoken more about where you live, what you do, where you went to school, your history, etc. than any other person here.  You're not protecting your anonymity; you're MAKING UP a story.  This is the alter ego I've been talking about.  (It's funny, only yesterday you were saying everything you've said on this site is true.  Now you're suddenly two people, neither one of whom went to UCLA.)

It's especially hilarious that you're now accusing me of coming here as some "weird sexual outlet."  Lynette, you spend an obscene amount of time posting nude pictures on the net - according to you, rate my rack, rate my knockers, and this site - and probably many others too.  Supposedly this is an activity that you share with both of your sisters.  You even post their naked pictures.  What sort of weird sexual outlet is that?

I'm not the one making a mountain out of a molehill.  You're just as involved in this conversation as anyone else is.  You look like a fool - and you want us to stop reminding you of it.  It's okay, Sybil.  As I've already said, I know you'll continue the ridiculous charade instead of admitting the truth.  It is quite interesting to watch, but it's starting to get boring. 

Here's a piece of advice - reread Closeup's post of pointers for making your pathetic story more believable.  Maybe it will work on the next site.

ok.... if your sister's screenname is "lynette" and this was posted under "lynette"... then what is YOUR screenname?  because you said you posted on hers sometimes and she posted on yours... i'm not trying to antagonize, i'm just really trying to figure out what you meant

I was commenting on what you said
as that will be lynette's (or lucky's, or one of lynette's other family members, or one of her many photogrpahers, or one of her bodyguards, or one of her entourages or whoever else she will next claim uses her screenname) next "reasoning" for this shitstorm.

Then I just went off on a tangent, like that time with my washtub...I just used it that morning to wash my turkey, which in those days was known as a "walking bird".  We'd always have walking bird on Thanksgiving with all the trimmings: cranberries, injun eyes, yams stuffed with gunpowder. Then we'd all watch football, which in those days was called "baseball"...

we are real people, and statements referring to our personal lives are true.

man after my own heart!

You being one of them...oops sorry, 2 of them 

I really don't even care if there are 2 of you or not, lots of couples post here using the same name. It's fine by me. It's that you try to be so clever in your deceit and deny and deny and skirt the questions until your back is up against and the gun is to your head. Then you come clean(sort of). Just be honest from the beginning and it wouldn't be a problem.  If you wanna post pics of you and your sister under your name, that's cool, but then why wouldnt you just say so from the beginning. For the sake of "entertainment" or a "joke"?? Shit, evade can come up with better material than that!
When's your other sister gonna make an appearance as "lynette"or am I talking ot her right now.
wow, you BOTH have 3 degrees from an unnamed Cali school which is not UCLA anymore...that's thuper! 

I think closeup was right, just post pics and can the rhetoric 

I don't know why I keep this up but anyway:
I said it would have been cool with me if you would have been a little more forthcoming about everything in the first place, not after all of this. I hardly think you're innocent in this "forum of hostile attitudes". I never called you any names or was overly rude when I  first confronted you about this. I was just curious and wanted an explanation, not because I think I deserve to know everyone's background, but you refer to yours every third post and a lot of it never added up to me and I just wanted to know if I was correct in my assumptions that something wasn't kosher(and I was right). YOU were the one who referred to me as a "fraud and an asshole long before you got here". Tell me, whose method sounds more hostile to you. But maybe it was lucky who wrote that, so my aplogies. Maybe next time make sure your views and opinions are on the same wavelength as your sisters before posting. Just a thought.

I don't know why I keep this up but anyway:
I said it would have been cool with me if you would have been a little more forthcoming about everything in the first place, not after all of this. I hardly think you're innocent in this "forum of hostile attitudes". I never called you any names or was overly rude when I  first confronted you about this. I was just curious and wanted an explanation, not because I think I deserve to know everyone's background, but you refer to yours every third post and a lot of it never added up to me and I just wanted to know if I was correct in my assumptions that something wasn't kosher(and I was right). YOU were the one who referred to me as a "fraud and an asshole long before you got here". Tell me, whose method sounds more hostile to you. But maybe it was lucky who wrote that, so my aplogies. Maybe next time make sure your views and opinions are on the same wavelength as your sisters before posting. Just a thought.

What part of "show us your tits" are you confused about? I'd think with 3 degrees, no matter what they're in, it would be clear to you by now that we don't beleive a word you post. Under any name. Try to focus that confused mind of yours on one thing-tits. Anything else is a strain for you and detracts why you're even being responded to anymore. Remember this as a hint: TITS=PICTURES=GOOD WORDS=BULLSHIT=BAD. Concentrate and stay focused, it's really not that difficult. But, I'm pretty sure you're still not getting it. Prove me wrong.

You didn't understand my "intelligent and enlightened" words, so I tried to use ones you would understand. I failed, but at least I tried. I never said, "women are only good for one thing", I said. "You are only good for one thing". BIG difference. Maybe I AM a fourteen year old jacking-off in his room. Maybe I'm a lesbian who just likes to look at naked women. Maybe I'm an astronaut posting from the International Space Station. Or maybe I'm all three: A 14 year-old lesbian jacking off in the space station. I never claimed to only be one person.

You didn't understand my "intelligent and enlightened" words, so I tried to use ones you would understand. I failed, but at least I tried. I never said, "women are only good for one thing", I said. "You are only good for one thing". BIG difference. Maybe I AM a fourteen year old jacking-off in his room. Maybe I'm a lesbian who just likes to look at naked women. Maybe I'm an astronaut posting from the International Space Station. Or maybe I'm all three: A 14 year-old lesbian jacking off in the space station. I never claimed to only be one person.

OK, THAT is funny!