QUOTE(Lynette @ Jul 13 2006, 11:41 PM)
Sorry if I sound like I'm disagreeing wwith you, but I am disagreeing with you! Even though a face shot posted by it's owner anywhere on the net kinda becomes public property, I believe it's NOBODY'S business to re-post a picture and compromise a womans identity without some kind of authorization. I think it's just a matter of ethics. I'm sure you'll disgaree with me on this point. But, it's not your face and naked body on the net (in public) that could possibly cause some embarrassing situations in your personal life through more exposure than you originally intended for the photo. Again, I cropped that photo the way I did because I didn't feel it was my place to ID her. I know for a fact that I get extremely pissed when I discover one of my pics either being used without my permission (especially one that show my face). Lynette, at this point, I'm having a very difficult time believing you are actually arguing along this line.
Vanessa is not worried about her face being posted and being embarrassed. She has a hugely popular public web site that people pay to use. And she contributes regularly to voyeurweb. Moreover, she posts hard-core sex, not just wicked-weasel shots. I'm sure that you know that because if you find one shot of Vanessa, chance are it will be surrounded by 100 BJ pics. So, you would hardly be embarrassing her here -- more like promoting her given her history.
As to someone using your pics, while I believe that attribution is appropriate, you never post your face anyway. So, who in the world is possibly going to look at one of your trademark photos, missing both the face and the legs from the mid-thigh on down, and say, "Oh my God, isn't that Lynette?"