QUOTE(Lynette @ Apr 16 2006, 07:49 PM)
I whole-heartedly agree. It's very difficult to hold your tongue on this site. There really seems to be more venom, and folks who are quick to judge and police here than on other sites of this nature. I didn't see any negative remarks regarding any of the pictures I've posted here either. But, the comments did intimate that they were not as liberal as some. My feeling is that 90% of the pics on this site are of boobs only. Why should mine be any different. Just because I started a thread on topless beaches? Then some guy wants me to provide pictographic proof that I've been nude on a clothing optional beach? I don't thing that's fair, and it just smells like another pervert trying to get women to display more raunchy kinds of pictures of herself. Anyone here who has visited the dicussion board at ratemyrack in the past three years can read my 179 page thread and see why I still have standards when it comes to posting semi-nude photos of myself. I think I'm done with this discussion now.
Wow, I almost fell out of my chair laughing at the thought of being called a "pervert" on a site called "RateMyMelons".

On the Disney site, this kind of comment might hurt, but here???
In defense of myself, I want to state the following:
1. Lynette created a thread about topless beaches, stating her support, and commenting on the conservatism of the USA.
2. I replied that I was in favor of NUDE beaches, but that I thought that Lynette was kind of conservative herself. At least in a relative sense.
3. I stated this after noticing that all of Lynette's pictures show her on a topless beach, not the clothing-optional beaches. How is it that one photo of her sojourn onto a nude beach didn't somehow slip in?
4. Lynette interpreted that as me requesting "explicit" photos of her.

I did NOT do that. There are plenty of nude beach photos out there where a person is naked, but no genitals or pubic hair are seen. In fact, I posted an example on a thread that I started. Is Lynette so unimaginative that she thinks the only photo beyond topless is a spread-eagle, gyno shot???
5. Now, the photos I have seen on Lynette's profile are from the shoulders to the waist. I have never seen a photo of her lower thighs, knees, ankles, or feet. Not even a belly button. While the 25% of Lynette that is on display in her photos is attractive, it is a strangely selective range of shots that she has in her profile.
6. So, in conclusion, Lynette has done nothing to refute me, but has resorted to namecalling.

And after studying this issue further in defense of myself, she is more conservative and reactionary than I originally thought.