Can have a ZZ Top beard (above/below):

And precede to abrade the poor woman's inner thigs with his mustache, goatee, Fu Manchu, soul patch, Van Dyke, Payes, etc.?

I remember reading a survey that said one of the single best things a guy could do for a woman before sex was shave his face....

Huh. And i thought I was being nice when I let go of the remote before sex. Now they're telling me I should shave too??? Next thing you know they're going to want their own orgasms too.

That's just crazy talk. In all my sexual experience it is evident that women don't HAVE orgasms.

And that is all®

Definitely a cadidate for top 50 posts of all time!

Good post Isaac_Putin!

Gnappster - my vibrator always gives me orgasms1

I think that men should shave their face if they want to go down...Because for me the beard hurts :S But I want my man to shaved from down too Maybe not totally but I don´t want to see the bush (and maybe hubbie shaves me today )

Shaving before sex? Dammit that means a shower too, guess I'm only going to be having sex twice a year from now on.

pics and/or videos?

From now on???? Isn't that an improvment from what you do now!!

i stay trimmed very close and shave around the base of my dick- wife likes it smooth, just like hers!

I don't like to be judgmental, but your wife shaves the base of HER dick too??!

I was wondering the same thing myself. I don't remember his wife having a dick The only dick she had on her body was mine.

BAM!

BAMMMM


And that is all™



OOPs, I didn't even see Bobo's or Gnapptser's last posts when it put this down.

Another for Evade.

Nah, no duh award needed. Just blame it on the Internet or say freak must have been tweaking with the boards or something. Just pass the blame. That's what I usually do. I usually just blame everything on being busy at work. I don't even have a job.

How about my slow f*****' dial up connection at home, or just not paying attention.

You people and your damn dial up connections. It takes me so freakin' long to read your posts!!!

I still use a 1200 baud modem.

I'll respond if 15 minutes when your message is finished displaying

ooops! I forgot to respond.

Well, here goes now!!!

Wow, that's s....l....o.......w

Okay, if you think about it a woman has a landing strip which is better with less stuff on it right, sure. Now think about a male lion without a mane, kind of scrawny looking, right? I hope y'all are picking up what I'm putting down .

you're attracted to male lions?

Simba watch out

ummm wayyyy different... a cock with a ton of hair around it makes it look
SMALLER!!! all that hair just gets in the way
i personally dont like male pubic hair. it should be either trimmed really short or just shaved off. its ugly and it doesnt taste good and lord knows how well you men clean yourselves, that alone scares me.

pubes are UGLY. cant see the Tree despite the Forest! hah. have some courtesy or some mutual respect for a women, get off your lazy ass and shave your damn self


AND THAT IS ALL

yes ma'am!

DONE !

You must avenge my death, Kimba....uhh I mean Simba.


I sense you have some strong opinions in this area.

1. The "landing strip, or less", as a phenomenon, has only been around about 20 years or so.

2. The full bush, however, has been around about 3 million years, depending on whether you believe in evolution or not. Even if you're a creationist, the full bush is about 6,000 years old.

3. During the time of the full bush, the human population grew to about 6 billion.

4. In nations with the "landing strip or less" (U.S. and Western Europe), there are actually relatively low birth rates.

The only logical conclusion - the landing strip is actually a turnoff to most of the world, and leads to less sex and a lower birth rate.

If you endorse Malthusian economic theory, though, that's probably a good thing.

I thought it was attributed to "pull and shoot" phenomenon.

"Pull and shoot"?? As in confusing the landing strip with a skeet target???

sort of, except in the version i'm referring to, there are a lot more available targets.

yeah... but in your case they're all running away


...and everyone knows it's harder to hit a moving target


...that's why you need to make sure to tie them up

in any case, shit, if shaving your pubes can result in less children then Im all for it. why do we need to keep bringing children into the world "by mistake" or just putting them up for adoption.
Anyways, the reason those ppl with a "full bush" back when that was a popular thing had more sex is because the technology wasnt around then, there was nothing else to do... now, instead of actually fucking your smooth and sexy girlfriends pussy, all those guys are sitting here looking at our tits.

Scientists believe that the original purpose of pubic hair was to carry pheromones out from the body and attract a mate (probably during "dawn of Man" time and before wearing animal skins).

Anyway, pubic hair is natural. Shaving it off is a recent practice, and you would think that today's men couldn't find their way to the "hole" unless somebody created a carefully groomed landing strip pointed straight toward it. Maybe they should put training wheels on their tongues, too?

Spotted



and what a phenomenon it is!

Isaac I disagree... the landing strip is very popular with women in Australia as is the "hollwywood/brazilian" and we are experiencing a growth in birth rates

I think Australia should probably be grouped in with the United States and Western Europe. And it doesn't tilt the demographics/statistics very much because it has a population of like 20 million?

eeew, bondi germs... no thanks...

how about this, we get that chick from lost (ok, and every other hot woman there)... and they can have bobaloo and 3d?

it's funny that pubic/arm pit hair's original function is exactly what we want to prevent it from today.
I was thinking about this on the way to work (it's a boring drive).
I know (at least I think I know) that shaving off pubic hair is a recent practice. In fact even trimming it is probably a pretty recent innovation due to a lot of repressed thinking on the subject for the past 1500 years or so, at least in the Western Hemisphere. But what did, say the Romans do. Did they trim? Shave? They were out there sexually. Did Roman women ever have a "chariot strip". What about other cultures? A lot of cultures have practiced some pretty original forms of body modification. It stands to reason that the short n curlies wouldn't have escaped some type of cutting/shaving/who knows. I've never really researched the topic, but it doesn't seem realistic that people have never shaved off their pubes before in history. But looking at what they had to shave with, maybe I could understand why haha.

Remember the Flinstones and what Fred had to use to shave?? I think he put a bee or some other insect in the shaver. That would suck having to shave pubes with something like that.

I beleive the bee went in a clamshell.

I was looking for a pic and stumbled upon this disturbing item

ah, yes, the prehistoric Bondi and Jork.

Okay. Sorry that was lame. I'm just not feeling very clever today.

it's funniest because they aren't here to defend themselves


no that they would refute it I'm sure.

It's funny you say that, cuz i was thinking exactly that as I was typing it... both thought actually.

Well as much as I dig most of the yanks on the board here we should never be "grouped" with the USA.... EVER! We are a country prodominantly made up from people with a UK Background, mixed in with countless other races and cultures... you should know that having ben here?



I refute those claims

Really, Bondi? What about the ANZUS pact, which formally "Groups" the USA and Australia in a military alliance?

I tend to see a lot of commonalities.

As I recall, the USA and Australia both were settled by UK colonists. Australia is a latecomer to the multiculture thing (except, of course, for aboriginals). The U.S.'s immigration policy, in terms of who it allowed in, and when, is pretty similar to Australia's.

You could probably compare, to a certain extent, the Australians' relationship with aboriginals with the U.S.'s treatment of its own aboriginal population. The U.S. was worse, though.

See Wikipedia's Australia entry for the White Australia Policy, abolished in 1973. I think it still shows when you walk around there. I tended to see more Asians as the majority minority population than Hispanics (U.S. majority minority), though.

When I was there, it looked VERY similar to USA. Same architecture, especially in Sydney. The outdoor touring areas, except for 12 Apostles, were VERY similar to the USA's rugged outdoors areas. Also, desert area is much larger.

The people dressed a little better in the workplace.

Classified as having a Western-style mixed economy.

Also,

Both countries experienced rapid development in certain geographic areas due to the discovery of gold (gold rush). In USA, it would be California. In Australia, I think it was Melbourne.

The size of both countries, leaving out Alaska, is very similar, too.

interesting, I guess when you come down to it, we can all trace our cultural origins back to Rome.

But if you really want to go a step above, into the elite countries, you're looking at places like Canada...

That is all®

*awaits shitstorm*

Isaac not a word you have said here is wrong, we are very similar to the US in a lot of ways but we should never be grouped with such a country. Yes we are allies but that is just like saying Spaniards are the same as Australians? We are also allies?

What I meant is that everyday Australians are nothing like everyday Americans. We are a totally different nation with our own ideals and values and we should not be grouped with anyone.



You are right Gnappy (except for the Canada thing ) let us trace all our steps back and if you are catholic we are all arabic!

I actually thing Canadians are more like Australians than Americans are. From the various Canucks I have met they seem to be a more laid back and relaxed people where Americans tend to be over the top and loud (speaking purely generally here)

FUCK YOU, YOU KOALA-LOVING, OUTBACK-LIVING, SHRIMP-ON-THE-BARBIE-EATING!!!...





















err, what were we talking about?