QUOTE(natalie @ May 19 2006, 01:32 PM)
Ok you'd have to be a dumbass if you thikn that the people on the planes and their families were in on it. All I'm saying is that there is lots of proof that the government had enough warning, evidence what have you to know something was up. A the other thing is it doesn't make any sense to me that the gov would destroy one of their own buildings (pentagon) but they was absolutely no evidence to prove that it was a plane that crashed through and whatever it was that did hit it it went thru too many concrete walls to have been a plane. The hole was the wrong size, the noise people heard didn't match up to that of a plane and all footage caught by any camera in any building nearby was confiscated in a matter of a couple hours. Ok grabbing all the footage make sense and like I said I don't know why they would bomb their own building. As far as I remember, a passenger list of the supposed plane was never found and it wasn't found out where it had come from or anything.
I wonder if my sister still had the e-mail?
I have a few conspiracy theories which i may share later. I totally believe in the Kurt Cobain, JFK and Marilyn Monroe conspiracies. Now what does everyone think about the Devinci code? There's a whole bunch of conspiracies wrapped up in that series, especially the book before it called Demons and Angels.

There are a number of sites that debunk the Da Vinci Code. I'm a lapsed Catholic but I think this book/movie tries to make a buck off of the Catholic Church, and Christianity in general as a prop.
The book out and out slandered Opus Dei, which is a quirky, strict Catholic group, but not affiliated in any way with violence, threats, or inside Catholic Church intrigue.
The Mary Magdalene stuff doesn't have a shred of proof to back it up.
The "Jesus as human being" original belief is false, too. All evidence points to the Council of Nicea (referred to in the Da Vinci Code) as deciding how Jesus could be the Son, the Father, and the Spirit at the same time. Not whether he was human or not.
The stuff regarding Roman Emperor Constantine is distorted also. He definitely institutionalized Christianity/Catholicism in the Roman Empire, but did not fiddle with the inner workings or doctrine.
Finally, Da Vinci himself was non political and wouldn't have had a lot of motivation to do the stuff with his art that is alluded to in the book.