Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+ Gnappster, The Ayatollah of Rye and Cola

cum on peps me and gnap, need sum lovin on our threads, please don't let us die!!!!!!!!!!! lol

I heartily concur!

holy shit, i'm page 6...I seemed to be stuck on page 5 forever

Your new avitar cracked me up! :roflmao: Is that Body Man from Yes You Can?

Slim Goodbody :lol:

CMan has hit upon the correct.
It is the infamous Slim Goodbody...the extremely gay man who preached nutrition with body parts printed on a skin coloured unitard. Strangely enuff, he was missing a penis.

I've always wondered who would win in a fight to the death: Slim Goodbody or Richard Simmons.

My bet is on Slim winning by unitard strangle at the 7 minute mark.

Attached thumbnail(s)

I was at a party on the weekend and they had face painters come in and face paint everybody up. Sounds kinda juvenile, but it was actually kinda cool since these guys were really good, and add to the fact that everybody was drinking, it made it all the more fun. Got some wild flames painted on my face.
Naturally this got me thinking about tits. It would be cool for some of the girls to paint (or get someone to paint) stuff on their tits or chest and post the pics of it(insert moneyshot joke here). It would look cool and sexy and be something different.
Since nobody reads my 411, maybe I'll post this on one the other sections to get it more exposure.



btw, I have a university degree in visual art, if anybody needs any "help" ^_^

Just popping in to say hi mister!!!!!!
You were always the funniest of the bunch.... I miss your sense of humour!!!


mmmmmmmwah!!!

Keep it real gnappy!

:nahnah:

don't mind me :goincrzy:

Attached image(s)

damn jrock, gave me his cold! :freak:

i knew i shouldn't have agreed to that heavy make-out session. :kisses:

hey, i only wanted to cuddle...

you were the one who said "don't worry, trust me, it'll be special" :gay: :nahnah:

What smells funny in here???



Oh wait, that's it...



ASS PIRATES!!! :blink: :blink: :blink:








:nahnah:

What smells funny in here???
Oh wait, that's it...
ASS PIRATES!!! :blink:  :blink:  :blink:
:nahnah:

:ph34r:

Attached thumbnail(s)

tee hee

Attached image(s)

boobs!

boobs!

duffman! oh yeah! :cheers:

Capt. Phallus.. hahahahah

:ph34r:

Hey gnappy... strolling through the funny yet disturbing dribble on your thread I noticed this pic and laughed.

A tv show in Aus called "The Footy Show" (which is a sports variety type show) has a look alike segment and someone sent this pic in to say it looked like one of the panel memebers ( an ex rugby player) need less to say the bulge was the butt of many jokes!

-Usless Aussie trivia no. 9853

gnappy, i knew i loved canadia for a reason... and now i know what it is... for everyone else out there, i swear this is true...

Group sex among consenting adults is neither prostitution nor a threat to society, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on Wednesday as it lifted a ban on so-called "swingers" clubs.

In a ruling that changes the way Canadian courts determine what poses a threat to the population, the top court threw out the conviction of a Montreal man who ran a club where members could have group sex in a private room behind locked doors.

"Consensual conduct behind code-locked doors can hardly be supposed to jeopardize a society as vigorous and tolerant as Canadian society," said the opinion of the seven-to-two majority, written by Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin.

Lawyers for Labaye and the owner of another Montreal swingers' club argued that consensual sex among groups of adults behind closed doors was neither indecent or a risk to society.

The Supreme Court judges agreed.

"Criminal indecency or obscenity must rest on actual harm or a significant risk of harm to individuals or society. The Crown failed to establish this essential element of the offense. (Its) case must therefore fail," McLachlin wrote.

In indecency cases, Canadian courts have traditionally probed whether the acts in question "breached the rules of conduct necessary for the proper functioning of society." The Supreme Court ruled that from now on, judges should pay more attention to whether society would be actively harmed.

This seemed to ensure there could be no repeat of Labaye's original conviction for causing "social harm" by allowing degrading and dehumanizing group sex to take place.

Social conservatives said the ruling could contribute to a general relaxing of indecency standards.

"The court is essentially saying that fairly public sexual acts can be tolerated in commercial establishments," said Janet Epp Buckingham of the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada.

The judges said that just because most Canadians might disapprove of swingers' clubs, this did not necessarily mean the establishments were socially dangerous.

"The causal link between images of sexuality and anti-social behavior cannot be assumed. Attitudes in themselves are not crimes, however deviant they may be or disgusting they may appear," the judges said, noting no one had been pressured to have sex or had paid for sex in the cases before the court.

"The autonomy and liberty of members of the public was not affected by unwanted confrontation with the sexual activity in question," they said.

Too many words, may I have a synopsis?

Too many words, may I have a synopsis?

in short, the supreme court of canada essentially said that group sex in clubs is perfectly legal :woohoo:

in short, the supreme court of canada essentially said that group sex in clubs is perfectly legal  :woohoo:

Whoo Hoo!!!!! :spankin:

I make a motion to hold the 1st annual RMM convention somewhere in Canada. All in favor?

yes it is, first marijuana, now this...we're slowly turning into amsterdam!

and jrock, it's canada, not canadia :P

"hey canadian boy, go back to canadia" ala Nelson Muntz

yes it is, first marijuana, now this...we're slowly turning into amsterdam!

and jrock, it's canada, not canadia :P

"hey canadian boy, go back to canadia" ala Nelson Muntz

*pointing* Ha-Ha


i know what i said... and i'm sticking with it :nahnah:

Swingers clubs were illegal in Canada? What about the US?

Swingers clubs are perfectly legal for sonsenting adults in Australia, especially in Sydney. Sydney is like the sexual epicentre of the country.

Oh and shit, Mari Jane is legal in Canada? Bravo....

The only place its legal in Australia is in Canberra which funnily enough is our nations capital.

As long as Alcohol is not illegal.. IM set for life! :drinkup:

As long as Alcohol is not illegal.. IM set for life! :drinkup:

I heard prohibition was coming back?

well MJ isn't legal in Canada. But if you get caught with some, you'll just get a small fine instead of a criminal charge. But if you're growing the shit, you're still fucked. So in short, you're allowed to smoke it, but it is illegal to grow or import it. So where the fuck are you supposed to get it from lol. But I think it's just a matter of time before they legalize it.

well MJ isn't legal in Canada. But if you get caught with some, you'll just get a small fine instead of a criminal charge. But if you're growing the shit, you're still fucked. So in short, you're allowed to smoke it, but it is illegal to grow or import it. So where the fuck are you supposed to get it from lol. But I think it's just a matter of time before they legalize it.

Oh I see, thats pretty much the same here. If you get caught with a "personal" amount the most they'll do is take it off you (and probably smoke it themselves) but if you grow or sell it your fucked.

In Canberra you are allowed to smoke in private places (e.g your own home, friends houses etc). You are also allowed to grow 2 plants per adult over 18 at your own home. The plants should not be taller than a metre and can only be grown naturally, not hyrdoponically

*books flight to canberra* :pimpers:

lol actually, i hardly ever smoke the stuff