Printable Version of Topic

Posted by: Isaac_Putin May 19 2006, 06:36 PM

Can have a ZZ Top beard (above/below):

And precede to abrade the poor woman's inner thigs with his mustache, goatee, Fu Manchu, soul patch, Van Dyke, Payes, etc.?

I remember reading a survey that said one of the single best things a guy could do for a woman before sex was shave his face....

Posted by: Bobaloo May 19 2006, 06:47 PM

Huh. And i thought I was being nice when I let go of the remote before sex. Now they're telling me I should shave too??? Next thing you know they're going to want their own orgasms too.

Posted by: Gnappster May 19 2006, 06:55 PM

That's just crazy talk. In all my sexual experience it is evident that women don't HAVE orgasms.

And that is allŪ

Posted by: Bobaloo May 19 2006, 07:06 PM

Definitely a cadidate for top 50 posts of all time!

Posted by: Pinkcheeks214 May 19 2006, 10:52 PM

Good post Isaac_Putin!

Gnappster - my vibrator always gives me orgasms1

Posted by: summoner May 20 2006, 12:33 AM

I think that men should shave their face if they want to go down...Because for me the beard hurts :S But I want my man to shaved from down too Maybe not totally but I donīt want to see the bush (and maybe hubbie shaves me today )

Posted by: belicked6924 May 20 2006, 09:20 PM

Shaving before sex? Dammit that means a shower too, guess I'm only going to be having sex twice a year from now on.

Posted by: Gnappster May 23 2006, 01:44 PM

pics and/or videos?

Posted by: ndboxer May 23 2006, 02:10 PM

From now on???? Isn't that an improvment from what you do now!!

Posted by: thenewguy May 25 2006, 05:13 PM

i stay trimmed very close and shave around the base of my dick- wife likes it smooth, just like hers!

Posted by: Gnappster May 25 2006, 05:26 PM

I don't like to be judgmental, but your wife shaves the base of HER dick too??!

Posted by: Bobaloo May 25 2006, 06:27 PM

I was wondering the same thing myself. I don't remember his wife having a dick The only dick she had on her body was mine.

Posted by: Gnappster May 25 2006, 07:01 PM

BAM!

Posted by: evade20 May 25 2006, 07:35 PM

BAMMMM


And that is all™



OOPs, I didn't even see Bobo's or Gnapptser's last posts when it put this down.

Another for Evade.

Posted by: Bobaloo May 26 2006, 09:45 AM

Nah, no duh award needed. Just blame it on the Internet or say freak must have been tweaking with the boards or something. Just pass the blame. That's what I usually do. I usually just blame everything on being busy at work. I don't even have a job.

Posted by: evade20 May 26 2006, 10:03 AM

How about my slow f*****' dial up connection at home, or just not paying attention.

Posted by: Bobaloo May 26 2006, 10:17 AM

You people and your damn dial up connections. It takes me so freakin' long to read your posts!!!

Posted by: Gnappster May 26 2006, 10:21 AM

I still use a 1200 baud modem.

Posted by: Bobaloo May 26 2006, 10:23 AM

I'll respond if 15 minutes when your message is finished displaying

Posted by: Gnappster May 26 2006, 12:35 PM

Posted by: Bobaloo May 26 2006, 12:46 PM

ooops! I forgot to respond.

Well, here goes now!!!

Wow, that's s....l....o.......w

Posted by: Hendo Sep 17 2006, 10:04 AM

Okay, if you think about it a woman has a landing strip which is better with less stuff on it right, sure. Now think about a male lion without a mane, kind of scrawny looking, right? I hope y'all are picking up what I'm putting down .

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 17 2006, 02:43 PM

you're attracted to male lions?

Posted by: bondiguy Sep 18 2006, 01:12 AM

Simba watch out

Posted by: fellatiofiend18 Sep 18 2006, 01:53 AM

ummm wayyyy different... a cock with a ton of hair around it makes it look
SMALLER!!! all that hair just gets in the way
i personally dont like male pubic hair. it should be either trimmed really short or just shaved off. its ugly and it doesnt taste good and lord knows how well you men clean yourselves, that alone scares me.

pubes are UGLY. cant see the Tree despite the Forest! hah. have some courtesy or some mutual respect for a women, get off your lazy ass and shave your damn self


AND THAT IS ALL

Posted by: bondiguy Sep 18 2006, 02:05 AM

yes ma'am!

Posted by: ddd35 Sep 18 2006, 06:32 AM

DONE !

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 18 2006, 12:19 PM

You must avenge my death, Kimba....uhh I mean Simba.


I sense you have some strong opinions in this area.

Posted by: Isaac_Putin Sep 18 2006, 12:30 PM

1. The "landing strip, or less", as a phenomenon, has only been around about 20 years or so.

2. The full bush, however, has been around about 3 million years, depending on whether you believe in evolution or not. Even if you're a creationist, the full bush is about 6,000 years old.

3. During the time of the full bush, the human population grew to about 6 billion.

4. In nations with the "landing strip or less" (U.S. and Western Europe), there are actually relatively low birth rates.

The only logical conclusion - the landing strip is actually a turnoff to most of the world, and leads to less sex and a lower birth rate.

If you endorse Malthusian economic theory, though, that's probably a good thing.

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 18 2006, 12:36 PM

I thought it was attributed to "pull and shoot" phenomenon.

Posted by: Isaac_Putin Sep 18 2006, 01:12 PM

"Pull and shoot"?? As in confusing the landing strip with a skeet target???

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 18 2006, 01:21 PM

sort of, except in the version i'm referring to, there are a lot more available targets.

Posted by: jrock8 Sep 18 2006, 03:33 PM

yeah... but in your case they're all running away


...and everyone knows it's harder to hit a moving target


...that's why you need to make sure to tie them up

Posted by: fellatiofiend18 Sep 19 2006, 12:10 AM

in any case, shit, if shaving your pubes can result in less children then Im all for it. why do we need to keep bringing children into the world "by mistake" or just putting them up for adoption.
Anyways, the reason those ppl with a "full bush" back when that was a popular thing had more sex is because the technology wasnt around then, there was nothing else to do... now, instead of actually fucking your smooth and sexy girlfriends pussy, all those guys are sitting here looking at our tits.

Posted by: Isaac_Putin Sep 19 2006, 12:39 AM

Scientists believe that the original purpose of pubic hair was to carry pheromones out from the body and attract a mate (probably during "dawn of Man" time and before wearing animal skins).

Anyway, pubic hair is natural. Shaving it off is a recent practice, and you would think that today's men couldn't find their way to the "hole" unless somebody created a carefully groomed landing strip pointed straight toward it. Maybe they should put training wheels on their tongues, too?

Posted by: bondiguy Sep 19 2006, 01:23 AM

Spotted



and what a phenomenon it is!

Isaac I disagree... the landing strip is very popular with women in Australia as is the "hollwywood/brazilian" and we are experiencing a growth in birth rates

Posted by: Isaac_Putin Sep 19 2006, 08:52 AM

I think Australia should probably be grouped in with the United States and Western Europe. And it doesn't tilt the demographics/statistics very much because it has a population of like 20 million?

Posted by: jrock8 Sep 19 2006, 11:34 AM

eeew, bondi germs... no thanks...

how about this, we get that chick from lost (ok, and every other hot woman there)... and they can have bobaloo and 3d?

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 19 2006, 01:27 PM

it's funny that pubic/arm pit hair's original function is exactly what we want to prevent it from today.
I was thinking about this on the way to work (it's a boring drive).
I know (at least I think I know) that shaving off pubic hair is a recent practice. In fact even trimming it is probably a pretty recent innovation due to a lot of repressed thinking on the subject for the past 1500 years or so, at least in the Western Hemisphere. But what did, say the Romans do. Did they trim? Shave? They were out there sexually. Did Roman women ever have a "chariot strip". What about other cultures? A lot of cultures have practiced some pretty original forms of body modification. It stands to reason that the short n curlies wouldn't have escaped some type of cutting/shaving/who knows. I've never really researched the topic, but it doesn't seem realistic that people have never shaved off their pubes before in history. But looking at what they had to shave with, maybe I could understand why haha.

Posted by: Bobaloo Sep 19 2006, 05:55 PM

Remember the Flinstones and what Fred had to use to shave?? I think he put a bee or some other insect in the shaver. That would suck having to shave pubes with something like that.

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 19 2006, 06:04 PM

I beleive the bee went in a clamshell.

I was looking for a pic and stumbled upon this disturbing item

Posted by: Bobaloo Sep 19 2006, 06:09 PM

ah, yes, the prehistoric Bondi and Jork.

Okay. Sorry that was lame. I'm just not feeling very clever today.

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 19 2006, 06:15 PM

it's funniest because they aren't here to defend themselves


no that they would refute it I'm sure.

Posted by: Bobaloo Sep 19 2006, 06:16 PM

It's funny you say that, cuz i was thinking exactly that as I was typing it... both thought actually.

Posted by: bondiguy Sep 20 2006, 12:08 AM

Well as much as I dig most of the yanks on the board here we should never be "grouped" with the USA.... EVER! We are a country prodominantly made up from people with a UK Background, mixed in with countless other races and cultures... you should know that having ben here?



I refute those claims

Posted by: Isaac_Putin Sep 20 2006, 10:01 AM

Really, Bondi? What about the ANZUS pact, which formally "Groups" the USA and Australia in a military alliance?

I tend to see a lot of commonalities.

As I recall, the USA and Australia both were settled by UK colonists. Australia is a latecomer to the multiculture thing (except, of course, for aboriginals). The U.S.'s immigration policy, in terms of who it allowed in, and when, is pretty similar to Australia's.

You could probably compare, to a certain extent, the Australians' relationship with aboriginals with the U.S.'s treatment of its own aboriginal population. The U.S. was worse, though.

See Wikipedia's Australia entry for the White Australia Policy, abolished in 1973. I think it still shows when you walk around there. I tended to see more Asians as the majority minority population than Hispanics (U.S. majority minority), though.

When I was there, it looked VERY similar to USA. Same architecture, especially in Sydney. The outdoor touring areas, except for 12 Apostles, were VERY similar to the USA's rugged outdoors areas. Also, desert area is much larger.

The people dressed a little better in the workplace.

Classified as having a Western-style mixed economy.

Posted by: Isaac_Putin Sep 20 2006, 10:09 AM

Also,

Both countries experienced rapid development in certain geographic areas due to the discovery of gold (gold rush). In USA, it would be California. In Australia, I think it was Melbourne.

The size of both countries, leaving out Alaska, is very similar, too.

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 20 2006, 11:40 AM

interesting, I guess when you come down to it, we can all trace our cultural origins back to Rome.

But if you really want to go a step above, into the elite countries, you're looking at places like Canada...

That is allŪ

*awaits shitstorm*

Posted by: bondiguy Sep 20 2006, 09:40 PM

Isaac not a word you have said here is wrong, we are very similar to the US in a lot of ways but we should never be grouped with such a country. Yes we are allies but that is just like saying Spaniards are the same as Australians? We are also allies?

What I meant is that everyday Australians are nothing like everyday Americans. We are a totally different nation with our own ideals and values and we should not be grouped with anyone.



You are right Gnappy (except for the Canada thing ) let us trace all our steps back and if you are catholic we are all arabic!

I actually thing Canadians are more like Australians than Americans are. From the various Canucks I have met they seem to be a more laid back and relaxed people where Americans tend to be over the top and loud (speaking purely generally here)

Posted by: jrock8 Sep 20 2006, 10:54 PM

FUCK YOU, YOU KOALA-LOVING, OUTBACK-LIVING, SHRIMP-ON-THE-BARBIE-EATING!!!...





















err, what were we talking about?

Posted by: HardDick69 Sep 20 2006, 11:40 PM

I prefer to be shaved as well as my g/f. I think we've tried every combo of pubic hair from shaved smooth to full on bush, lightly trim, etc. and shaved always wins.

It really breaks down to personal preference, there's no yes or no answer.

Posted by: closeup Sep 21 2006, 12:09 AM

I think listing the similarities countries share; allies, geographic size, etc., isn't a very accurate way to group a bunch of it's citizens into a common group. I think a more accurate way is to think in terms of; style of government, prosperity and a shared sense of history. I think Canada is pretty close to the USA in many ways because of those factors. Mexico, a lot less so. Aussies, even less. I think Americans are sort of arrogant in the sense that when we see a foreign country with a Mcdonalds, Starbucks, Ford, etc,etc, we think the people in those countries are "Americanized". But they aren't. Democratic nations share a lot of the same values, but they are far from homogenized. And that's a good thing. I'd be willing to bet that most Americans think of Canada as little more than a 51st state, ie following the USA lockstep in just about everything political that matters. The same holds true for the U.K. and Australia,but to a lesser degree, because they are further away. Most Americans would be surprised to find out first -hand what the rest of the world thinks of them. But that doesn't make those perceptions accurate, America is the most successful experiment in self-government ever attempted. And that is hard for other countries to understand. We've tossed out kings and queens and dictators and found a better way. It's one of those things that's hard to understand until you experience it, then you can't imagine any other way. Can anyone picture the Queen of the USA? (Anyone who says Hillary Clinton, give yourself a swift kick in the nuts)

Posted by: Isaac_Putin Sep 21 2006, 12:39 AM

Bondi, after your last post, I do understand what you are saying.

Posted by: bondiguy Sep 21 2006, 12:56 AM

exhibit A



WOW, an insightful noobie



Cloesup, you are beggining to stamp yourself as a very smart man around here, well done! I agree with everything you say. Sadly Americans aren't well liked in many countries outside the US which is a shame because I meet a lot of great people from the states every year.

Australia is becoming less and less like England with each passing decade. Although we are still a part of the Commonwealth and have very close ties to England, I believe once the current Queen passes away or steps down from the thrown we will have a referendum here and we will become a republic nation. For the very fact that we will not have Prince Charles as our King. Also, because most of the people who are fierce monarchists are the elderly and as their numbers dwindle so does their cause...



Cheers.... it is sometimes hard to get a point across with just black and white text? Glad we understand each other

Posted by: closeup Sep 21 2006, 01:14 AM

I'm a little confused. Are you saying Prince Charles won't be your king, or the people have to vote to oust him, or vote to keep him. How much of a choice do Australians have in the matter?

Posted by: bondiguy Sep 21 2006, 01:21 AM

Sorry I may have been a little confusing there, im on medication

About a decade ago we had a referendum here asking whether we wanted to remain a monarchy or become a republic. It was before I was old enough to vote but the pro monarchy government at the time stacked the question in their own favour and it was subsequently endorsed we remain a monarchy.

Now, it is a common belief that once Queen Elizabeth II passes away or steps down from the thrown that Australians will once again be asked via referendum if we wish to become a republic or not, and if so, it is commonly believed that the outcome would be in favour of being a republic nation this time around because NO ONE in Australia wants to be under a King Charles

Posted by: jrock8 Sep 21 2006, 01:24 AM

well, except for you...

Posted by: bondiguy Sep 21 2006, 01:28 AM

Posted by: closeup Sep 21 2006, 01:30 AM

Why? In what way are you "under" Queen Elizebeth II? Does she have any power or control over aussie government or the peoples day- to- day lives? I guess I always assumed she was strictly a figurehead with really nothing more than a ceremonial post, even in England. Can she actually change/make laws? Why do you think Charles would make a bad king?

Posted by: bondiguy Sep 21 2006, 01:32 AM

She is exactly what you have stated, a figure head and little else. She has no power to change or make current laws.

Charles is seen as a joke here in Australia. We are a nation that is already leaning toward becoming a republic and that would just be the last straw so to speak!

Posted by: fellatiofiend18 Sep 21 2006, 02:35 AM

i sense some hostility toward americans and it actually kind of pisses me off to be placed into the stereotype. I honestly dont think being "american" makes me any certain way, be it loud or over the top..... i simply would say thats my personality or actually, i would say thats the Italian in me...



.... i was thinking more like OPRAH WINFREY... haha jk

anyways, in regards to what ive highlighted in green. i think youre right and its actually quite disturbing. i would have to say im offended by much of the perception of others about americans. its appalling to me

Posted by: bondiguy Sep 21 2006, 03:35 AM

I have no hostility toward America or Americans at all. I was merely conveying the perception of Americans by most Non Americans around the world. I live in an area highly poppulated with tourists in the summer, many Americans. Like every bunch there are some cool ones, and there are some thank have the superiority complex which at times gives citizens of the USA a bad name



Cloesup was bang on the money... if only there were more like him! All I can say is that the Bush administration has a lot to answer for in regards to America's worldwide image

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 21 2006, 12:14 PM

hahaha, fuckin funny!



As for the rest of this. I tend to stay away from debates on religion, politics, or nationality, but since I'm a posting addict I'll weigh in.
I don't think most non-americans have a problem with americans as individuals. I think it's more that people have a problem with the US's international policies but I think a lot of Americans feel the same way as well. I only live an hour from the border and have met TONS of Americans. Some fit the stereotype, most don't. Hell most people here are American and seem pretty cool.
And plus, yeah America is the last great superpower so of course they are up on a pedestal for every other country to scrutinize and sometimes be jealous of in some respects.
As a Canadian, I feel we are VERY much influenced by the US, mostly because we get so much of our tv and movies from south of our border. But at the same time we draw influence from the UK to as we still have ties, much like Australia, plus we have a rich culture all our own that most people outside Canada don't realize because we get lumped in with the USA due to our geogrpahy.
As far as the Queen, we are part of the Commonwealth, so the queen is on a lot of our money and the monarchy makes royal visits here, but that's about where it ends. There isn't much of a push to sever ties with Britain becuase it is there pretty much just for show. The only complaint most people have is the public money spent on Royal visits here, but personally I don't give a shit either way. If the government didn't waste money on that, they'd waste it on something else.

Posted by: closeup Sep 21 2006, 01:32 PM

Canada has a rich cultural history? When I think of famous Canadians, the first name that comes to mind is Dudley Doright. Isn't he on the Canadian five dollar bill?

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 21 2006, 01:34 PM

hahaha, my point exactly.












(and it's the 10 dollar bill, stupid )

Posted by: closeup Sep 21 2006, 01:43 PM

Or ,as it's known in Maine, the $7.50 dollar bill. Whenever I put my change into the change-counting machine at the bank, it always spits back the ones from Canada. I think it's trying to tell me something. I read that Canada might change over to wooden currency. The only hold-up is they can't find enough "artisans" to carve Dudleys profile on 50 million coins.

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 21 2006, 01:52 PM

lol, what's next, our subamarine with the screen door?

Posted by: jrock8 Sep 21 2006, 02:01 PM

don't be silly...





















...they replaced it with plywood months ago

Posted by: closeup Sep 21 2006, 02:33 PM

We have a beach in Maine that's about twenty miles south of Portland that's called Old Orchard Beach. Every summer it gets over-run with Canadians taking their summer vacations. Some of them have been taking the same cottages for 50 years in a row. To get a job in any of the bars or restaurants, it helps to speak French. After Labor Day, they all go home, along with the Massholes. The next wave is the cruise ships that bring all the leaf-peepers. Once they leave, we have the state pretty much to ourselves, except for the skiers, snowmobilers and hunters. They don't call Maine "Vacationland" for nothing. I'd prefer all the tourists just fly over and throw their wallets out the window and keep going. Maybe I should have posted this in the "Rant" thread, but it's too late now.

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 21 2006, 02:53 PM

I thought you were quoting it from the Travel Maine website

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 21 2006, 02:56 PM

that's better

Posted by: closeup Sep 21 2006, 03:19 PM

Tourists are like ants at a picinic. Just something you have to put up with to enjoy the outdoors. Except ants won't stop you every fifteen minutes and ask for directions.

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 21 2006, 03:30 PM

Just squash them under your boot.

















And for ants, use Raid.

Posted by: closeup Sep 21 2006, 03:41 PM

If it weren't illegal, we'd hunt them like deer and moose. Except there won't be a one per permit limit.

Posted by: fellatiofiend18 Sep 21 2006, 04:02 PM

my grandparents have a house in Bathe and I love it there. Its been in our family for as long as i can remember and we always have family reunions in Maine. aside from the deathly onslaught of mosquitoes, its great.

annnddd im a Masshole... proud of it too!!!

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 21 2006, 04:03 PM

http://urbanlegends.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://web.archive.org/web/20010405034510/www.manbeef.com/home.html

Posted by: closeup Sep 21 2006, 04:10 PM

Damn, where'd you find that? Does it say anything about tourists being a cheaper cut than regular humans? It would be sorta like substituting pigeon for chicken.

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 21 2006, 04:33 PM

I can find anything(and often do)

hmmm that might be tricky though. What happens if your carcass were sent out of state. Would they get a discount for you being a tourist cut of rib eye?

Posted by: closeup Sep 21 2006, 04:42 PM

It would be like a Maine lobster. Top dollar when sold out of state, two for $15.99 when sold locally. Mainers are just a higher quality product.

Posted by: Bobaloo Sep 21 2006, 04:52 PM

It's obvious how he found that site. I'm sure when he was searching for man beef, man meat, and things like that, he was expecting to yield quite different results than man meat for nutritional consumption.

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 21 2006, 04:57 PM

Posted by: Bobaloo Sep 21 2006, 06:08 PM

haha. what's funny is that that comes one the screen when the zombies are attacking humans so they can eat their brains. And now we're talking about man meat. The connection you made I'm sure was inadvertant, but humorous for me nonetheless.

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 21 2006, 06:18 PM

I was hoping nobody would make that WORNG connection.
Of course for me to think that I would have to forget where I was posting.

Posted by: Bobaloo Sep 21 2006, 06:29 PM

Welcome to RMMM... (rate my man meat)

Posted by: bondiguy Sep 22 2006, 12:41 AM

Who the fuck is dudley doright???



The funny thing is you can spot tourists from a mile away, in Australia just look for the people wearing the ridiclously coloured shirts with AUSTRALIA printed across the front or back and the ones holding stuffed koalas. I swear I think people make those shirts just to play a joke on the tourists!

Or look for the yanks that are drinking Fosters... because NO ONE in Australia drinks that shit

Posted by: Bobaloo Sep 22 2006, 11:24 AM

But here they tell us that Fosters is Australian for beer

Posted by: Gnappster Sep 22 2006, 11:36 AM

Bee--ear?

Posted by: Bobaloo Sep 22 2006, 11:38 AM

zackley!!!

Reminds me of the restaurant scene in Mickey Blue Eyes.

Posted by: closeup Sep 22 2006, 01:09 PM

Dudley Doright is a Royal Canadian Mountie. He looks a lot like Jay Leno. It's a cartoon, if I remember right, it's part of Bulwinkle and Rocky. (A talking moose and a flying squirrel) I imagine most of the people who think up these characters do a lot of drugs.

Posted by: Isaac_Putin Sep 22 2006, 01:36 PM

You could DEFINITELY spot us a mile away. We were wearing shorts and had our beach stuff with us in downtown Sydney in August (which is pretty much winter time in Australia -- even if it gets up to 65F in the summer time). People were walking by and practically laughing out loud at us. But, I feel like I had the last laugh because I visited three different nude beaches in one day... I fell in love with my wife all over again on Obelisk Beach.

I don't think we drank much beer at all in Australia. Instead, we were drinking wine. Australia has one of the best wineries in the world -- especially for blended wines. The winery is Rosemount Estates. They have the whole gamut, but the best were the Shiraz and Shiraz-Cabernet bottles. I don't know if anybody can beat them on a price/quality basis....

Posted by: bondiguy Sep 22 2006, 06:52 PM

Spot on once again Isaac...glad yu had a good time here. We tend to have pretty mild winters compared to the countries most people on here live in. In summer it gets a lot hotter than 65F... Averages around 28C and regularly hits 30-35 with the odd scorcher thrown in too

A little known fact about Australia is the quality of our wines. Wines from the Hunter Valley and South Australia are world class. We export to places like Italy and France and when you can do that, you know you are making a quality drop!

Posted by: fellatiofiend18 Sep 25 2006, 12:16 AM

haha its Rocky and Bulwinkle... are things ass backwards where you come from?

Posted by: lonely1275 Sep 25 2006, 11:42 PM

Just keep moving your cute ass backwards until I say stop.