Printable Version of Topic

Posted by: bondiguy May 18 2006, 01:45 AM

Wether you believe them or not, or take them case by case, you can't help but love hearing about a good conspiracy theory!!!

On this talkback show the other night on radio they had people ringing in about their 9/11 conspiracy theories which prompted me to think... do you guys and girls have any good ones???

I am a massive fan of Kurt Cobain and I strongly believe his death was not suicide and that he was murdered. There is a stack of evidence supporting that claim which I could go into if you like but i want to hear some others too...

Posted by: Assfucker May 18 2006, 08:38 AM

I saw Elvis on South Beach the other week

Posted by: Isaac_Putin May 18 2006, 09:34 AM

Wether you believe them or not, or take them case by case, you can't help but love hearing about a good conspiracy theory!!!

On this talkback show the other night on radio they had people ringing in about their 9/11 conspiracy theories which prompted me to think... do you guys and girls have any good ones???

I am a massive fan of Kurt Cobain and I strongly believe his death was not suicide and that he was murdered. There is a stack of evidence supporting that claim which I could go into if you like but i want to hear some others too...

Posted by: Gnappster May 18 2006, 01:26 PM

whoa deja vu!

Anyway, as for the 9/11 conspiracy I never bought into it before and in general I don't buy into most conspiracy theories anymore. But after seeing the documentary, it really got me thinking. Obviously it is done with a bias to the filmmakers' point of view but they have a lot better explanation than I've ever heard from the government and all their facts are verifiable. What happened to the people supposedly on the planes is a little hard to believe, but take 90 minutes out of your day and watch http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=911+loose+change .
The biggest kicker is that no skyscraper has ever totally collapsed due to fire or being hit by a plane. Even the Empire State building which was hit by a bomber never came close to collapsing.

I'm not saying I believe everything in the documentary, but I think the government has a lot more involvement than they've let on.

So instead of watching the Sex and the City Marathon tonight, take some time and watch http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=911+loose+change

And that is all®

Posted by: Assfucker May 18 2006, 01:29 PM

So instead of watching the Sex and the City Marathon tonight, take some time and watch 9/11 Loose Change

Posted by: natalie May 18 2006, 02:19 PM

whoa deja vu!

Anyway, as for the 9/11 conspiracy I never bought into it before and in general I don't buy into most conspiracy theories anymore. But after seeing the documentary, it really got me thinking. Obviously it is done with a bias to the filmmakers' point of view but they have a lot better explanation than I've ever heard from the government and all their facts are verifiable. What happened to the people supposedly on the planes is a little hard to believe, but take 90 minutes out of your day and watch THIS .
The biggest kicker is that no skyscraper has ever totally collapsed due to fire or being hit by a plane. Even the Empire State building which was hit by a bomber never came close to collapsing.

I'm not saying I believe everything in the documentary, but I think the government has a lot more involvement than they've let on.

So instead of watching the Sex and the City Marathon tonight, take some time and watch 9/11 Loose Change

And that is all®

Posted by: evade20 May 18 2006, 02:41 PM

I saw Elvis on South Beach the other week

Posted by: Gnappster May 18 2006, 03:01 PM

I don't know if I still have it but I was sent a video about the supposed plane that hit the pentagon. If you really look at the photos and hear what the  I witnesses have to say I truly believe the government hit it with a missile. How convienient that the "plane" hit the only part of the building that was under repairs and had been for some time.

Posted by: closeup2 May 18 2006, 03:53 PM

My main argument against most conspiracy theories is they give the government way to much credit for being able to both pull it off AND keep it quiet after. I've seen "Loose Change" and alot of their information is taken out of context to the point of being unbelievable. When some of the people who were interveiwed for that show were subsequently asked if what was aired actually represented what they had said, many of the people stated that it did not. It's almost analogous to cutting letters out of a newspaper, printing the message you want to dissiminate, than point out that it all came from the "New York Times" because that's where all the words came from. If 9/11 was a government set-up, would George Bush be shown sitting there like an idiot reading to a bunch of schoolkids when the planes attacked? That being said, I did see Marilyn Monroe giving Jimmy Hoffa a BJ behind a New Jersey resturant. JFK and Elvis were waiting for their turn sitting at the counter.

Posted by: Gnappster May 18 2006, 03:56 PM

My main argument against most conspiracy theories is they give the government way to much credit for being able to both pull it off AND keep it quiet after. I've seen "Loose Change" and alot of their information is taken out of context to the point of being unbelievable. When some of the people who were interveiwed for that show were subsequently asked if what was aired actually represented what they had said, many of the people stated that it did not. It's almost analogous to cutting letters out of a newspaper, printing the message you want to dissiminate, than point out that it all came from the "New York Times" because that's where all the words came from. If 9/11  was a government set-up, would George Bush be shown sitting there like an idiot reading to a bunch of schoolkids when the planes attacked? That being said, I did see Marilyn Monroe giving Jimmy Hoffa a BJ behind a New Jersey resturant. JFK and Elvis were waiting for their turn sitting at the counter.

Posted by: closeup2 May 18 2006, 03:58 PM

PICS!?

Posted by: Gnappster May 18 2006, 04:00 PM

Plenty of pictures, but they're all blurry and out of focus. Kinda like all the ones you see of Bigfoot and Aliens.

Posted by: closeup2 May 18 2006, 04:11 PM

Santa Claus is a good example of people needing to believe in things that aren't there. I was watching some documentary about how some people don't believe that man has walked on the moon. It was like no matter what these people were shown or how their "evidence" was debunked, you could tell not one of them had any intention of changing their minds. They can join the "Flat Earth Society" along with the Elvis sighters and the 911 gang and all go live at the North Pole where it rains gumdrops.

Posted by: evade20 May 18 2006, 04:12 PM

My main argument against most conspiracy theories is they give the government way to much credit for being able to both pull it off AND keep it quiet after. I've seen "Loose Change" and alot of their information is taken out of context to the point of being unbelievable. When some of the people who were interveiwed for that show were subsequently asked if what was aired actually represented what they had said, many of the people stated that it did not. It's almost analogous to cutting letters out of a newspaper, printing the message you want to dissiminate, than point out that it all came from the "New York Times" because that's where all the words came from. If 9/11  was a government set-up, would George Bush be shown sitting there like an idiot reading to a bunch of schoolkids when the planes attacked? That being said, I did see Marilyn Monroe giving Jimmy Hoffa a BJ behind a New Jersey resturant. JFK and Elvis were waiting for their turn sitting at the counter.

Posted by: closeup2 May 18 2006, 04:14 PM

Isn't that Lee Harvey Oswalds' head in the second window from the left? Looks just like him from this angle.

Posted by: evade20 May 18 2006, 04:16 PM

Isn't that Lee Harvey Oswalds' head in the second window from the left? Looks just like him from this angle.

Posted by: Gnappster May 18 2006, 04:18 PM

Nighthawks, that's a great painting(yes I'm an art nerd too, among other forms of nerdery).

Posted by: closeup2 May 18 2006, 04:20 PM

Nighthawks, that's a great painting(yes I'm an art nerd too, among other forms of nerdery).

Posted by: evade20 May 18 2006, 04:26 PM

Edward Hopper right? I thought it was called "Lost Dreams" or something like that.

Posted by: Isaac_Putin May 18 2006, 06:12 PM

Santa Claus is a good example of people needing to believe in things that aren't there. I was watching some documentary about how some people don't believe that man has walked on the moon. It was like no matter what these people were shown or how their "evidence" was debunked, you could tell not one of them had any intention of changing their minds. They can join the "Flat Earth Society" along with the Elvis sighters and the 911 gang and all go live at the North Pole where it rains gumdrops.

Posted by: Gnappster May 18 2006, 06:22 PM

My brother dated a beautiful female lawyer -- who didn't believe we landed on the moon.  Can you imagine the 10's of thousands of people that would have to keep that secret???  All astronaughts and the mission control people knowing that they are basically staring at nothing and pretending that the people landed?  And the 100+ people who have gone into space?  The thousands of spaceship designers, and repair personnel, who are basically creating movie props under this theory?

And the moon rocks, what are they?  And space junk, what exactly is that?  And are satellites?  Are they real?  Because my GPS and satellite radio work pretty well for stuff based on a fiction.

I never got a chance to ask her about all this.  My brother broke up with her because she apparently thought that the "myth" of the female orgasm was a massive conspiracy theory, too.

Posted by: bondiguy May 19 2006, 12:00 AM

WOW this thread is alive! I love it guys..

Like I said you don't have to believe in them but conspiracy theories are great... I love them!

For the record i think 9/11 WAS a terrorist act by Al Queda, and I believe man has walked onto the moon!

Re 9/11 how do the theorist explain the 50 odd people who lost their lives on flight 77, and their grieveing families or are they all in on it? A missile? please....

Re Kurt Cobain there are too many facts to ignore;

At the time of his death Kurt had 3 times the lethal limit of Heroin in his bloodstream, making it impossible for him to be coherent enough to load a gun, put it into his mouth and pull the triger!

What makes it even more unblieveable is that there are NO fingerprints on the gun at all, and Kurt was not wearing gloves when he "shot himself"

Courtney was about to be divorced by Kurt and he had actually written a will excluding her but it was yet to be finalised and signed and was therefore defunct.

There is a tonne of evidence and if anyone is interested I can go into it in further detail.... in the meantime keep those theories coming!!!

Posted by: Gnappster May 19 2006, 12:51 PM

WOW this thread is alive! I love it guys..

Like I said you don't have to believe in them but conspiracy theories are great... I love them!

For the record i think 9/11 WAS a terrorist act by Al Queda, and I believe man has walked onto the moon!

Re 9/11 how do the theorist explain the 50 odd people who lost their lives on flight 77, and their grieveing families or are they all in on it? A missile? please....

Re Kurt Cobain there are too many facts to ignore;

At the time of his death Kurt had 3 times the lethal limit of Heroin in his bloodstream, making it impossible for him to be coherent enough to load a gun, put it into his mouth and pull the triger!

What makes it even more unblieveable is that there are NO fingerprints on the gun at all, and Kurt was not wearing gloves when he "shot himself"

Courtney was about to be divorced by Kurt and he had actually written a will excluding her but it was yet to be finalised and signed and was therefore defunct.

There is a tonne of evidence and if anyone is interested I can go into it in further detail.... in the meantime keep those theories coming!!!

Posted by: fellatiofiend18 May 19 2006, 01:19 PM

i absolutely LOVE conspiracy theories!!!

i dont know much about the Kurt Cobain situation and i am definitely open to everyones views on 9/11.

but i must say, i am enthralled by the JFK assassination! BIGTIME conspiracy in sooooo many ways. i have to admit that this was the single most interesting thing i ever learned in highschool. lol. and i think the whole thing is fucked upppp!!!

i love this discussion thread! way to go!

Posted by: natalie May 19 2006, 01:32 PM

Ok you'd have to be a dumbass if you thikn that the people on the planes and their families were in on it. All I'm saying is that there is lots of proof that the government had enough warning, evidence what have you to know something was up. A the other thing is it doesn't make any sense to me that the gov would destroy one of their own buildings (pentagon) but they was absolutely no evidence to prove that it was a plane that crashed through and whatever it was that did hit it it went thru too many concrete walls to have been a plane. The hole was the wrong size, the noise people heard didn't match up to that of a plane and all footage caught by any camera in any building nearby was confiscated in a matter of a couple hours. Ok grabbing all the footage make sense and like I said I don't know why they would bomb their own building. As far as I remember, a passenger list of the supposed plane was never found and it wasn't found out where it had come from or anything.


I wonder if my sister still had the e-mail?


I have a few conspiracy theories which i may share later. I totally believe in the Kurt Cobain, JFK and Marilyn Monroe conspiracies. Now what does everyone think about the Devinci code? There's a whole bunch of conspiracies wrapped up in that series, especially the book before it called Demons and Angels.

Posted by: closeup2 May 19 2006, 01:32 PM

It wouldn't be too far fetched to believe that nut job Courtney Love had something to do with it.

Posted by: fellatiofiend18 May 19 2006, 01:43 PM

Now what does everyone think about the Devinci code? There's a whole bunch of conspiracies wrapped up in that series, especially the book before it called Demons and Angels.

Posted by: evade20 May 19 2006, 04:05 PM

My brother dated a beautiful female lawyer -- who didn't believe we landed on the moon.  Can you imagine the 10's of thousands of people that would have to keep that secret???  All astronaughts and the mission control people knowing that they are basically staring at nothing and pretending that the people landed?  And the 100+ people who have gone into space?  The thousands of spaceship designers, and repair personnel, who are basically creating movie props under this theory?

And the moon rocks, what are they?  And space junk, what exactly is that?  And are satellites?  Are they real?  Because my GPS and satellite radio work pretty well for stuff based on a fiction.

I never got a chance to ask her about all this.  My brother broke up with her because she apparently thought that the "myth" of the female orgasm was a massive conspiracy theory, too.

Posted by: Lynette May 19 2006, 05:35 PM

No conclussions just yet. I'm still trying to break the damn code!

Posted by: Gnappster May 19 2006, 06:00 PM

I'm still trying to figure out how they got the caramel inside the caramilk bar.

Posted by: Isaac_Putin May 19 2006, 06:02 PM

Ok you'd have to be a dumbass if you thikn that the people on the planes and their families were in on it. All I'm saying is that there is lots of proof that the government had enough warning, evidence what have you to know something was up. A the other thing is it doesn't make any sense to me that the gov would destroy one of their own buildings (pentagon) but they was absolutely no evidence to prove that it was a plane that crashed through and whatever it was that did hit it it went thru too many concrete walls to have been a plane. The hole was the wrong size, the noise people heard didn't match up to that of a plane and all footage caught by any camera in any building nearby was confiscated in a matter of a couple hours. Ok grabbing all the footage make sense and like I said I don't know why they would bomb their own  building. As far as I remember, a passenger list of the supposed plane was never found and it wasn't found out where it had come from or anything.
I wonder if my sister still had the e-mail?
I have a few conspiracy theories which i may share later. I totally believe in the Kurt Cobain, JFK and Marilyn Monroe conspiracies. Now what does everyone think about the Devinci code? There's a whole bunch of conspiracies wrapped up in that series, especially the book before it called Demons and Angels.

Posted by: natalie May 19 2006, 06:17 PM

I'm still trying to figure out how they got the caramel inside the caramilk bar.

Posted by: Bobaloo May 20 2006, 10:10 AM

I'm still trying to figure out how they got the caramel inside the caramilk bar.

Posted by: Bobaloo May 20 2006, 10:11 AM

As I'm sure you figured out, you brothers lawyer friend must be a bit daft.  The moon rocks that came back from one of the trips to the moon were treated as more valuable that gold or diamonds.  They cost that much to obtain.  They were devided up among serveral university and government labs to be studied.  Some of the rocks were studied in both the astronomy and chemistry department of the university where I work.  That was many years ago.  In one of the labs where these rocks were studied, they used a hand-crank grain mill to grind the samples being studied into dust. 

A number of years later when the proffessor in charge of that lab died, I was involved with helping clean up the lab.  I ended up with that grain mill.  (It now decorates a shelf in my basement, along with othe dust and clutter.)  Of course we went to the moon.

How do you spell " P H O TO S H O P ?"

Posted by: closeup2 May 20 2006, 12:25 PM

Here's my take on the "Davinci Code". I listen to an unabridged Cd recording during a long trip. In the first part of the book, the lead character can't figure out a clue that's written in code. He's supposed to be an expert but he's stumped. Since I'm listening to the story instead of seeing the words on a page, I can't see what the words look like in code. Anyway, he calls in the world-class expert. At first, she's baffled by this code. Come to find out it can be read when held up to a mirror! Now c'mon, I could have "deciphered" a code that simple in the fifth grade. Right then, I lost all interest in the rest of the story but continued to listen because I still had many more mile to drive. I didn't even make it all the way to the end before my interest had completely waned. As a historical novel, it sucked. As a work of fiction, it sucked and evidently as a movie it sucks. So overall, I'd say it sucked.

Posted by: evade20 May 20 2006, 07:03 PM

Will you will your moon rock grain mill to me??  That would be the most awesomest possession ever!!!

Posted by: belicked6924 May 20 2006, 08:15 PM

I think it's quite hysterical that so many people can take a fictional work of art and try to apply it as factual based proof of history ie most recently the Da Vinci Code novel. As I personally haven't done any research outside of starting to read the book I won't claim to be an expert on it, but from the first page of the text Dan Brown does an excellent job of portraying a fictional story so that it is read as truth. I don't know if he has claimed that parts of the book that have been "debunked" are factual outside of what was written. Thus I find it very hysterical and laughable that people spend so much of their life trying to debunk fictional material.

Posted by: bondiguy May 21 2006, 02:44 AM

It wouldn't be too far fetched to believe that nut job Courtney Love had something to do with it.

With all that herion in his system he must have been attempting suicide on the installment plan. Courtney Love probably just hurried it along a few years.

Posted by: bondiguy May 21 2006, 02:45 AM

p.s if anyone needs hel transcribing the letter I'll happily do so

Posted by: Bobaloo May 22 2006, 11:29 AM

I think it's quite hysterical that so many people can take a fictional work of art and try to apply it as factual based proof of history ie most recently the Da Vinci Code novel. As I personally haven't done any research outside of starting to read the book I won't claim to be an expert on it, but from the first page of the text Dan Brown does an excellent job of portraying a fictional story so that it is read as truth. I don't know if he has claimed that parts of the book that have been "debunked" are factual outside of what was written. Thus I find it very hysterical and laughable that people spend so much of their life trying to debunk fictional material. 

Posted by: bondiguy May 23 2006, 12:28 AM

By the way, I wonder if those same people are trying to figure out plot holes and unrealistic situations when they're watching porn.

Posted by: closeup2 May 23 2006, 07:38 AM

I hold those beliefs very strongly!
The theory that is out there and of which I believe is that their nanny, a friend of Cuntenys was shooting up with Kurt and provided him with heroin with a very high purity to it, alas leaving him unconscious. It was then the nanny who propped the shotgun into his mouth and pulled it, leaving no fingerprints and putting the needles back neatly into the container, locking the door from the inside and escaping through the window.

I believe KC was troubled but was a very different man once Francis was born and would not have left her by herself.

If u look at the Suicide note there is 2 distinct writers. The first and majority reads mainly as a farewell letter, as in KC was about to leave Nirvana. It isn;t until the second part starts that it reads more like a suicide note

Posted by: Bobaloo May 23 2006, 10:24 AM

YEAH!

Like why would that girl fuck that old fat hairy guy, she is obviously attractive enough to take her pic, and why don't nurses blow me when i have to go to hospital? Oh and why is that guy a pool cleaner when he has a footlong... he should be in Porn!

Posted by: evade20 Jun 2 2006, 11:15 PM

There are a number of sites that debunk the Da Vinci Code.  I'm a lapsed Catholic but I think this book/movie tries to make a buck off of the Catholic Church, and Christianity in general as a prop.

The book out and out slandered Opus Dei, which is a quirky, strict Catholic group, but not affiliated in any way with violence, threats, or inside Catholic Church intrigue.

The Mary Magdalene stuff doesn't have a shred of proof to back it up.

The "Jesus as human being" original belief is false, too.  All evidence points to the Council of Nicea (referred to in the Da Vinci Code) as deciding how Jesus could be the Son, the Father, and the Spirit at the same time.  Not whether he was human or not.

The stuff regarding Roman Emperor Constantine is distorted also.  He definitely institutionalized Christianity/Catholicism in the Roman Empire, but did not fiddle with the inner workings or doctrine.

Finally, Da Vinci himself was non political and wouldn't have had a lot of motivation to do the stuff with his art that is alluded to in the book.

Posted by: natalie Jun 3 2006, 01:26 PM

Re: The RC Church and the DaVinci Code

( From:  http://www.bettybowers.com/davinci.html )
There's no place like Rome! There's no place like Rome!

This man (on the left wearing a fabulous vintage chiffon-lined Dior gold lamé gown over a silk Vera Wang empire waist tulle cocktail dress, accessorized with a 3-foot beaded peaked House of Whoville hat, and the ruby slippers Judy Garland wore in the Wizard of Oz) is worried that The Da Vinci Code might make the Roman Catholic Church look foolish.

Posted by: closeup4 Jun 3 2006, 03:44 PM

Re: The RC Church and the DaVinci Code

( From:  http://www.bettybowers.com/davinci.html )
There's no place like Rome! There's no place like Rome!

This man (on the left wearing a fabulous vintage chiffon-lined Dior gold lamé gown over a silk Vera Wang empire waist tulle cocktail dress, accessorized with a 3-foot beaded peaked House of Whoville hat, and the ruby slippers Judy Garland wore in the Wizard of Oz) is worried that The Da Vinci Code might make the Roman Catholic Church look foolish.

Posted by: evade20 Jun 3 2006, 07:59 PM

Funniest post I've read in a long while. Nicely done, the House of Whoville hat is a classic.

Posted by: evade20 Jul 14 2006, 08:02 AM

Damn, Closeup, Did your 'puter eat another password? (or 2?)  You're going to be a noob for life at this rate.

I wish I could claim credit for any of the cleverness.  Somebody sent me a badly scrambled email about it sans the pic.  I Googled the line " worried that The Da Vinci Code might make the Roman Catholic Church look foolish." 

Who needs a brain?       

Pay no attention to the man behind the green curtain in the corner.

Posted by: bondiguy Jul 14 2006, 07:14 PM

Ok WTF is a QMUD????

Posted by: evade20 Jul 14 2006, 07:52 PM

Ok WTF is a QMUD????

Posted by: evade20 Jul 14 2006, 07:54 PM

Haven't figured it out yet?  Come on Bondi, look at it through a mirror....  

Posted by: bondiguy Jul 14 2006, 07:56 PM

TMTOYH.... spell that one out!



















Too Much Time On Your Hands

Posted by: evade20 Jul 14 2006, 08:00 PM

TMTOYH.... spell that one out!
Too Much Time On Your Hands

Posted by: bondiguy Jul 14 2006, 08:24 PM

Hey I use my time efficiently! I eat, sleep, smoke, drink and surf... and fuck!

Posted by: evade20 Jul 14 2006, 11:27 PM

Hey I use my time efficiently! I eat, sleep, smoke, drink and surf... and fuck!

Posted by: bondiguy Jul 14 2006, 11:54 PM

Are there more important things in life I am missing out on?

Posted by: Urgewyrm Jul 22 2006, 04:25 AM

Dan Brown is an utter hack of a writer. If anyone wants to look into the whole idea that Jesus actually moved on instead of died on the cross should check out Holy Blood, Holy Grail instead. It's fairly well researched and Brown ripped most of his stuff from it. It's an interesting work regardless of what you believe.

The Loose Change video is such a crock of shit as to be almost funny. It's what happens when people don't research what they're talking about, want to have a specific outcome as opposed to letting the facts dictate what is happening and want to have even more ammo to throw at the current administration ( like they need more shit to throw at these morons ).

You want real conspiracies? Check out JFK, RFK, John Lennon, Martin Luther King, Marilyn Monroe, DIA, S-4 or the Phoenix Lights. Hell, check out TWA Flight 800 and ask yourself why the CIA was involved on a domestic plane crash.

If you want really pertinent conspiracies, check your local headlines.

God, my first post on a boob board and it's about conspiracy theories!

Posted by: COMEDYMAN Jul 22 2006, 06:50 AM

Dan Brown is an utter hack of a writer. If anyone wants to look into the whole idea that Jesus actually moved on instead of died on the cross should check out Holy Blood, Holy Grail instead. It's fairly well researched and  Brown ripped most of his stuff from it. It's an interesting work regardless of what you believe.

The Loose Change video is such a crock of shit as to be almost funny. It's what happens when people don't research what they're talking about, want to have a specific outcome as opposed to letting the facts dictate what is happening and want to have even more ammo to throw at the current administration ( like they need more shit to throw at these morons ).

You want real conspiracies? Check out JFK, RFK, John Lennon, Martin Luther King, Marilyn Monroe, DIA, S-4 or the Phoenix Lights. Hell, check out TWA Flight 800 and ask yourself why the CIA was involved on a domestic plane crash.

If you want really pertinent conspiracies, check your local headlines.

God, my first post on a boob board and it's about conspiracy theories!

Posted by: Bobaloo Jul 22 2006, 10:17 AM

hey its ok... conspiracy theories and nice titties go hand in hand

Posted by: frenchie Jul 22 2006, 03:03 PM

My brother dated a beautiful female lawyer -- who didn't believe we landed on the moon.  Can you imagine the 10's of thousands of people that would have to keep that secret???  All astronaughts and the mission control people knowing that they are basically staring at nothing and pretending that the people landed?  And the 100+ people who have gone into space?  The thousands of spaceship designers, and repair personnel, who are basically creating movie props under this theory?

And the moon rocks, what are they?  And space junk, what exactly is that?  And are satellites?  Are they real?  Because my GPS and satellite radio work pretty well for stuff based on a fiction.

I never got a chance to ask her about all this.  My brother broke up with her because she apparently thought that the "myth" of the female orgasm was a massive conspiracy theory, too.

Posted by: belicked6924 Jul 23 2006, 05:46 PM

Hey I use my time efficiently! I eat, sleep, smoke, drink and surf... and fuck!

Posted by: bondiguy Jul 24 2006, 01:39 AM

When it only takes 30 seconds to fuck that leaves a lot of time for the rest.

Posted by: Bobaloo Jul 24 2006, 11:29 AM

I like to surf...... 

Posted by: Gnappster Jul 24 2006, 12:36 PM

I like to surf...... 

Posted by: Bobaloo Jul 24 2006, 12:55 PM

Do you ever surf the net? 

Posted by: bondiguy Jul 25 2006, 01:45 AM

Now there's a man who knows what his priorities are in life!

Do you ever surf the net? 

Posted by: evade20 Oct 6 2006, 08:42 PM

Google is taking over the world or at least the net... as evidenced by this http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/06/business/07youtubecnd.html?ex=1317787200&en=ea20d95711771a76&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

Google is in serious talks to acquire YouTube, the wildly successful online video-sharing Web site, for $1.6 billion in cash and stock, people involved in the negotiations said today.

Now if they will only start Bluetube for all of us that would like to see some nudity in our vids.

Posted by: bondiguy Oct 7 2006, 01:43 AM

Google is taking over the world  or at least the net... as evidenced by this http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/06/business/07youtubecnd.html?ex=1317787200&en=ea20d95711771a76&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

Google is in serious talks to acquire YouTube, the wildly successful online video-sharing Web site, for $1.6 billion in cash and stock, people involved in the negotiations said today.

Now if they will only start Bluetube for all of us that would like to see some nudity in our vids.

Posted by: Gnappster Oct 18 2006, 04:34 PM

I don't usually buy into a lot of conspiracy theories because a lot of the stuff you read is either conspiracy nuts who only tell you half the story, or skeptics who only tell you half the story.
But I read a book called http://www.amazon.com/Rough-Guide-Conspiracy-Theories-Guides/dp/1843534452/sr=1-1/qid=1161203201/ref=sr_1_1/002-1394258-2888068?ie=UTF8&s=books .
It's a level headed look at dozens of conspiracy theories throughout recorded history. The authors always remain unbiased and never decide one way or the other with a few exceptions that were found to be true(some of the Castro stuff etc.) They present the info and let you decide or research further. Many are laughable, some are outlandish, and some are downright scary in their implications. In the end many people are gonna believe what they want to believe regardless of a silly thing called facts and evidence, but this book is worth a read.

Also, I just watched http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4801421350507881969&q=jeff Still don't know what to think of the whole 911 fiasco, but this is certainly compelling stuff.

That is all.

Posted by: Bobaloo Oct 18 2006, 05:44 PM

I don't usually buy into a lot of conspiracy theories because a lot of the stuff you read is either conspiracy nuts who only tell you half the story, or skeptics who only tell you half the story.
But I read a book called http://www.amazon.com/Rough-Guide-Conspiracy-Theories-Guides/dp/1843534452/sr=1-1/qid=1161203201/ref=sr_1_1/002-1394258-2888068?ie=UTF8&s=books .
It's a level headed look at dozens of conspiracy theories throughout recorded history. The authors always remain unbiased and never decide one way or the other with a few exceptions that were found to be true(some of the Castro stuff etc.) They present the info and let you decide or research further. Many are laughable, some are outlandish, and some are downright scary in their implications. In the end many people are gonna believe what they want to believe regardless of a silly thing called facts and evidence, but this book is worth a read.

Also, I just watched http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4801421350507881969&q=jeff Still don't know what to think of the whole 911 fiasco, but this is certainly compelling stuff.

That is all.

Posted by: Gnappster Oct 18 2006, 06:12 PM

Did you know UFOs are real, but there's a huge government conspiracy to cover it up?

Posted by: Bobaloo Oct 18 2006, 06:12 PM

Did you know UFOs are real, but there's a huge government conspiracy to cover it up?

Posted by: Gnappster Oct 18 2006, 06:42 PM

Oops. I forgot to add the pic. but I got it there now. 

Posted by: evade20 Oct 18 2006, 07:52 PM

of course!
the saucer people who are in cahoots with the RAND corporation.

that's a great word-- cahoots.
if I join another message board, or if I need another alias here, it will be cahoots.

Posted by: Bobaloo Oct 18 2006, 08:49 PM

of course!
the saucer people who are in cahoots with the RAND corporation.

that's a great word-- cahoots.
if I join another message board, or if I need another alias here, it will be cahoots.

Posted by: closeup Oct 18 2006, 09:00 PM

I use the term all the time.  Well, maybe not ALL the time, but quite a bit.  Never thought of using it as a logon name, though.

back in the day of BBSs, there was this one BBS I would hang out at where they had a BBS-wide game called LORD (legend of the red dragon).  It was a goofy text-based RPG, but it was fun enough. YOu could only do so much per day so it didn't consume you like other RPGs can.  Anyway... my logon name there was "You."  It was funny cuz the game would update what was going on and it would say, "you won the battle," or "you acquired 50 gems," or whatever.  what was funnier was when I was offline and someone would pick a fight with me, it would say you won the battle or whatever and it'd be really confusing.  isn't that a great story?

Posted by: Bobaloo Oct 18 2006, 09:03 PM

Shouldn't this be in the "Sex Stories" thread?  I know I got all excited reading it. Except for no tits, no ass and no plot, it's the perfect RMM post.

Posted by: closeup Oct 18 2006, 09:08 PM

You don't get to 4k+ posts without learning a thing or two.

Posted by: evade20 Oct 18 2006, 09:32 PM

You've been taking lessons from Bondi. Yesterday was a classic:
"I have nothing constructive to add to this thread." Why type all that when you can pull an "evade" and just post a  ?

Posted by: Gnappster Oct 19 2006, 01:11 AM

I use the term all the time.  Well, maybe not ALL the time, but quite a bit.  Never thought of using it as a logon name, though.

back in the day of BBSs, there was this one BBS I would hang out at where they had a BBS-wide game called LORD (legend of the red dragon).  It was a goofy text-based RPG, but it was fun enough. YOu could only do so much per day so it didn't consume you like other RPGs can.  Anyway... my logon name there was "You."  It was funny cuz the game would update what was going on and it would say, "you won the battle," or "you acquired 50 gems," or whatever.  what was funnier was when I was offline and someone would pick a fight with me, it would say you won the battle or whatever and it'd be really confusing.  isn't that a great story?

You've been taking lessons from Bondi. Yesterday was a classic:
"I have nothing constructive to add to this thread." Why type all that when you can pull an "evade" and just post a  ?

Good point! 

Actually you could probably go through RMM and find more Bondi posts with just a single smilie that i have ever posted...how else do you think he got 7K plus posts?
     

Posted by: bondiguy Oct 19 2006, 02:59 AM

I don't usually buy into a lot of conspiracy theories because a lot of the stuff you read is either conspiracy nuts who only tell you half the story, or skeptics who only tell you half the story.
But I read a book called http://www.amazon.com/Rough-Guide-Conspiracy-Theories-Guides/dp/1843534452/sr=1-1/qid=1161203201/ref=sr_1_1/002-1394258-2888068?ie=UTF8&s=books .
It's a level headed look at dozens of conspiracy theories throughout recorded history. The authors always remain unbiased and never decide one way or the other with a few exceptions that were found to be true(some of the Castro stuff etc.) They present the info and let you decide or research further. Many are laughable, some are outlandish, and some are downright scary in their implications. In the end many people are gonna believe what they want to believe regardless of a silly thing called facts and evidence, but this book is worth a read.

Also, I just watched http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4801421350507881969&q=jeff Still don't know what to think of the whole 911 fiasco, but this is certainly compelling stuff.

That is all.

you should reserve cahoots1 through 9 just in case....

You've been taking lessons from Bondi. Yesterday was a classic:
"I have nothing constructive to add to this thread." Why type all that when you can pull an "evade" and just post a  ?

Good point! 

Actually you could probably go through RMM and find more Bondi posts with just a single smilie that i have ever posted...how else do you think he got 7K plus posts?
     

Posted by: bondiguy Oct 19 2006, 03:00 AM

Oh and Gnappy... spotted pointless busy work

Posted by: Gnappster Oct 19 2006, 12:55 PM

I gotta buy that book... I find conspiracy theories fascinating!

Oh and I dont believe the 911 ones at all... they are very flawed!
Actually pretty funny evade!
One of my better lines haha
True, but in 99% of cases I am just taking the piss out of you

Posted by: bondiguy Oct 19 2006, 06:24 PM

yeah, check it out, guarantee you'll like it.
do you mean you DON'T believe the 911 conspiracy theories, or you don't believe what the gov't tels you. There is some good stuff in the book on it.
I think a lot of 911 conspiracy theories are heavily biased but the video I linked to above is pretty impartial(I think anyway). The guy is just addressing the collapse of the buildings and how improbable it was. I haven't seen or read as compelling of evidence arguing the opposite, but I'm not a structural engineer either so who knows.

Posted by: Gnappster Oct 19 2006, 06:33 PM

Is that guarantee not a guarantee?

I DONT believe it was a conspiracy! The video eveidence is all they rely on and it is sketchy at best. Words like improbable prove my theory. Was it probable that anyone ever thought that passenger jets would fly at speed into these buildings when they built them?

I am sure the US gov't is a corrupt organisation but no one is that irresponsible

Posted by: bondiguy Oct 19 2006, 06:45 PM

well you'd be surprised how irresponsible the US(and other countries') governments are. There is stuff in the book, not heresay but a lot of declassified info that you'll be shocked to find out. I can't remember a lot of it, but for instance, nazi chemical and bio warfare scientists were kept from prosecution after the war and employed by the US government's own chemical warfare departments. There's plenty more irrefutable (more or less) info that will make anything seem possible. I'm not saying the government pulled off 911 but I don't think they did much to stop it.
Now read the damn book.

(and you're right, not a guarantee  )

Posted by: bondiguy Aug 30 2007, 07:16 AM

I can't believe it is approaching a year since the last post in this topic! We have had a bunch of new members since then so I wanted to revive it to hear some theories from the newer members.

Here's another to kick it off:

At the moment Sydney is in the gripe of the epidemic that is Equine Influenza, or in lamen's terms... Horse Flu. Doesn't sound like that big of a deal but it is crippling the racing industry heading into the busiest time of the year for them, Springtime.

Anyway the epicentre of the outbreak is at Randwick Racecourse, which coincidentally is the proposed sight for the Christian World Youth Day next year. The racing industry does not want the site to be used for the festival as it will call to a halt racing and it has been a big argument for a few months here. As a conspiracy theory I "believe" the Catholic Church has infected the horses as a payback to the AJC (owners of the racecourse) for not allowing them to use their site.




WOW you read all that?

Posted by: ddd35 Aug 30 2007, 09:40 AM

I can't believe it is approaching a year since the last post in this topic! We have had a bunch of new members since then so I wanted to revive it to hear some theories from the newer members.

Here's another to kick it off:

At the moment Sydney is in the gripe of the epidemic that is Equine Influenza, or in lamen's terms... Horse Flu. Doesn't sound like that big of a deal but it is crippling the racing industry heading into the busiest time of the year for them, Springtime.

Anyway the epicentre of the outbreak is at Randwick Racecourse, which coincidentally is the proposed sight for the Christian World Youth Day next year. The racing industry does not want the site to be used for the festival as it will call to a halt racing and it has been a big argument for a few months here. As a conspiracy theory I "believe" the Catholic Church has infected the horses as a payback to the AJC (owners of the racecourse) for not allowing them to use their site.
WOW you read all that?

Posted by: Gnappster Aug 30 2007, 03:42 PM

I can't believe it is approaching a year since the last post in this topic! We have had a bunch of new members since then so I wanted to revive it to hear some theories from the newer members.

Here's another to kick it off:

At the moment Sydney is in the gripe of the epidemic that is Equine Influenza, or in lamen's terms... Horse Flu. Doesn't sound like that big of a deal but it is crippling the racing industry heading into the busiest time of the year for them, Springtime.

Anyway the epicentre of the outbreak is at Randwick Racecourse, which coincidentally is the proposed sight for the Christian World Youth Day next year. The racing industry does not want the site to be used for the festival as it will call to a halt racing and it has been a big argument for a few months here. As a conspiracy theory I "believe" the Catholic Church has infected the horses as a payback to the AJC (owners of the racecourse) for not allowing them to use their site.
WOW you read all that?

Posted by: Bobaloo Aug 30 2007, 04:22 PM

What would Jesus do? 

Posted by: Gnappster Aug 30 2007, 04:36 PM

PM cock pics to all the beautiful ladies here and scare them away

Posted by: HardDick69 Aug 30 2007, 08:38 PM

I've watched the Loose Change 9/11 video a while back and it had some interesting points, but some of it was too far fetched.

One thing that really struck me in the vid, and something that I brought up the day I saw the towers fell was that, how the hell can a tower who got hit w/ a plane drop so damn fast? It was like it disintegrated into dust as it was falling. A melting steel inner structure wouldn't cause the building to do that. In the video they say the building fell at nearly free fall speeds, which I find very odd. I do believe there were explosives in the building that aided the fall of the building.

Last year on 9/11 MSNBC played the entire 9/11/2001 coverage from like 8am until 11am, so if you turned on the TV you thought it was live coverage and they had the Firemen on there that said that it sounded like bombs going off inside, which struck me considering I had just see the loose change 9/11.

The missile regarding the pentagon is also interesting considering the plane parts outside the pentagon weren't the right parts at all. My brother in law is an ex aviation mechanic and he said that immediately after the photos were posted the days following 9/11, how the engine in the picture didn't even go w/ that particular plane.

I don't take the loose change 9/11 to heart, but I do believe that they brought up a lot of interesting points.

Any one done any research on the links between Freemasons and the founding of the United States? I watched a History channel show about it one time and it was really spooky/awesome.

-HD

Posted by: bondiguy Aug 30 2007, 11:52 PM

What would Jesus do? 

Posted by: ddd35 Sep 2 2007, 07:10 AM

p.s HD I am usually into ALL conspiracy theories but the 911 ones I have heard are nothing short of ridiculous anti government propaganda... I mean I think Bush is a fucking hilbilly but I don't think his governemt did that!

Posted by: bondiguy Sep 3 2007, 01:54 AM

I would have to agree

Posted by: UncleBuck Sep 27 2007, 07:32 PM

as I was trolling around the net I came across this,, something to think about
I hope either way the guy is safe,and that they find the nuke if this the case

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=109306


Posted By: Never_Surrender Date: Friday, 7 September 2007, 11:06 a.m.

Ok....

Something just occurred to me....

On Aug. 30th we had the B-52 nuke incident, no one knows for sure if there were 5 or 6 nukes yet.

If there were 6 ONE IS MISSING

On Sept. 3rd, we are being told that a famous man went missing... a highly connected famous man.

for days they have been searching for him.....

OR HAVE THEY?

This all just hit me when I was watching the news for the first time in about two weeks, and I heard them say that the MILITARY is helping to look for this Fossett guy.

WHAT? The Military????

It was then that it hit me....

THEY ARE LOOKING FOR THE MISSING NUKE!

Nevada Guard Aids Search for Missing Pilot Fossett

Air Force units assist in search for adventurer Steve Fossett

COME ON, THERE IS NO WAY THAT THIS IS ALL FOR SOME GUY!!

They even have GOOGLE searching for the guy FROM SPACE!!

Mark my words.... THEY ARE LOOKING FOR A MISSING NUKE.

This Fossett guy is ONLY missing because they needed a cover story... they had to find a way to explain all of the military planes that were going to be flying around over Nevada.

They needed a good excuse and VOILA... Fossett provided it!!

As soon as they locate the nuke, they will produce the set up "crash" scene!

Right now that man is in a bunker somewhere with his plane hidden inside or underneath of a mountain being held in safe keeping away from public eyes until they find what they are really looking for......... A MISSING 150 KILOTON NUCLEAR WEAPON!!

and then they will take him out to some remote location and set up the "crash" scene.... or, there is a chance that Fossett is in on this whole thing and that he volunteered to "disappear" for a few days into some government bunker so that he could play a part in saving the country from being nuked.

In which case he will show up in a week or two with some heroic story of survival and everyone will be amazed that he made it.

I don't know why it took me so long to get this one but...

they are DEFINITELY NOT looking for a missing man using ALL of these military resources and EVEN going as far as to have satellites searching FROM SPACE....

THEY ARE LOOKING FOR SOMETHING THAT HAS TO DO WITH MATTERS OF NATIONAL SECURITY.... mark my words.

Posted by: bondiguy Sep 27 2007, 11:32 PM

I thought I smoked alotta pot

Posted by: UncleBuck Dec 4 2007, 03:24 PM

History mystery
Bet this was never taught in history.


Have a history teacher explain this ----- if they can.

Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.

Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860
John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.

Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
Both wives lost their children while living in the White House.

Both Presidents were shot on a Friday.
Both Presidents were shot in the head.

Now it gets really weird.

Lincoln 's secretary was named Kennedy.
Kennedy's Secretary was named Lincoln .

Both were assassinated by Southerners.
Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.

Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln , was born in 1808.
Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.

John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln , was born in 1839.
Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939

Both assassins were known by their three names.
Both names are composed of fifteen letters.

Now hang on to your seat.

Lincoln was shot at the theater named 'Ford.'
Kennedy was shot in a car called ' Lincoln ' made by 'Ford.'

Lincoln was shot in a theater and his assassin ran and hid in a warehouse.
Kennedy was shot from a warehouse and his assassin ran and hid in a theater.

Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.

And here's the kicker...

A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe , Maryland
A week before Kennedy was shot, he was in Marilyn Monroe.

Posted by: DoubleJ Dec 4 2007, 03:34 PM

History mystery
Bet this was never taught in history.
Have a history teacher explain this ----- if they can.

Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.

Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860
John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.

Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
Both wives lost their children while living in the White House.

Both Presidents were shot on a Friday.
Both Presidents were shot in the head.

Now it gets really weird.

Lincoln 's secretary was named Kennedy.
Kennedy's Secretary was named Lincoln .

Both were assassinated by Southerners.
Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.

Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln , was born in 1808.
Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.

John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln , was born in 1839.
Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939

Both assassins were known by their three names.
Both names are composed of fifteen letters.

Now hang on to your seat.

Lincoln was shot at the theater named 'Ford.'
Kennedy was shot in a car called ' Lincoln ' made by 'Ford.'

Lincoln was shot in a theater and his assassin ran and hid in a warehouse.
Kennedy was shot from a warehouse and his assassin ran and hid in a theater.

Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.

And here's the kicker...

A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe , Maryland
A week before Kennedy was shot, he was in Marilyn Monroe.

Posted by: UncleBuck Dec 4 2007, 03:39 PM

interesting, where'd you get this info?

Posted by: SKULLZ0MBIE Dec 4 2007, 06:50 PM

Conspiracy of One

Posted by: SKULLZ0MBIE Dec 4 2007, 06:58 PM

Watch this http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173

Then ask yourself is this a Conspiracy or Reality?

America from Freedom to Fascism

Posted by: bondiguy Dec 6 2007, 12:23 AM

History mystery
Bet this was never taught in history.
Have a history teacher explain this ----- if they can.

Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.

Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860
John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.

Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
Both wives lost their children while living in the White House.

Both Presidents were shot on a Friday.
Both Presidents were shot in the head.

Now it gets really weird.

Lincoln 's secretary was named Kennedy.
Kennedy's Secretary was named Lincoln .

Both were assassinated by Southerners.
Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.

Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln , was born in 1808.
Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.

John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln , was born in 1839.
Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939

Both assassins were known by their three names.
Both names are composed of fifteen letters.

Now hang on to your seat.

Lincoln was shot at the theater named 'Ford.'
Kennedy was shot in a car called ' Lincoln ' made by 'Ford.'

Lincoln was shot in a theater and his assassin ran and hid in a warehouse.
Kennedy was shot from a warehouse and his assassin ran and hid in a theater.

Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.

And here's the kicker...

A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe , Maryland
A week before Kennedy was shot, he was in Marilyn Monroe.

Posted by: belicked6924 Dec 6 2007, 09:55 AM

History mystery
Bet this was never taught in history.
Have a history teacher explain this ----- if they can.

Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.

Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860
John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.

Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
Both wives lost their children while living in the White House.

Both Presidents were shot on a Friday.
Both Presidents were shot in the head.

Now it gets really weird.

Lincoln 's secretary was named Kennedy.
Kennedy's Secretary was named Lincoln .

Both were assassinated by Southerners.
Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.

Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln , was born in 1808.
Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.

John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln , was born in 1839.
Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939

Both assassins were known by their three names.
Both names are composed of fifteen letters.

Now hang on to your seat.

Lincoln was shot at the theater named 'Ford.'
Kennedy was shot in a car called ' Lincoln ' made by 'Ford.'

Lincoln was shot in a theater and his assassin ran and hid in a warehouse.
Kennedy was shot from a warehouse and his assassin ran and hid in a theater.

Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.

And here's the kicker...

A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe , Maryland
A week before Kennedy was shot, he was in Marilyn Monroe.

Posted by: bondiguy Dec 6 2007, 11:56 PM

We actually went through all of this in my American Government class senior year of high school. All except the Marilyn Monroe part. 

Posted by: Damor Dec 7 2007, 12:23 AM

So it all checks out?

Posted by: bondiguy Dec 7 2007, 12:31 AM

This explains a few things.

http://www.snopes.com/history/american/lincoln-kennedy.asp

Posted by: Damor Dec 7 2007, 12:37 AM

So it is one of those things whilst somewhat true worded and altered to sound more convincing

Posted by: bondiguy Dec 7 2007, 12:55 AM

Yes.. funny how people seem to do that.  I just got a email at work about a kid getting killed while talking on his cell phone while it was plugged into the wall.

A hoax, but I was like no fucking way and unplugged my shit right then and there.  I think the ladies with the plug in vibes might want to read the warning label on those things!

Posted by: Damor Dec 7 2007, 08:29 PM

What about plug in pussy's

Posted by: bondiguy Dec 7 2007, 08:38 PM

   Good question!!  I think I need to get a surge protecor.

Posted by: SKULLZ0MBIE Dec 11 2007, 04:29 PM

Watch this http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5522575736561316064&q=One+Nation+Under+Siege&total=70&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
Then ask yourself Conspiracy Theorice or just Conspiracy
One Nation Under Siege

Posted by: baby21 Dec 13 2007, 12:58 AM

tupac isnt dead and i'm going to have his babies.. hows that one for ya!?

Posted by: SKULLZ0MBIE Dec 13 2007, 06:37 AM

tupac isnt dead and i'm going to have his babies.. hows that one for ya!?

Posted by: bondiguy Dec 14 2007, 12:16 AM

tupac isnt dead and i'm going to have his babies.. hows that one for ya!?

Posted by: The_Flash2019 Sep 8 2008, 10:27 PM

Fucking Aliens stole my fucking money.

Posted by: ddd35 Sep 9 2008, 09:11 AM

Fucking Aliens stole my fucking money.

Posted by: yomankan Dec 27 2008, 02:19 PM

I don't know if I still have it but I was sent a video about the supposed plane that hit the pentagon. If you really look at the photos and hear what the  I witnesses have to say I truly believe the government hit it with a missile. How convienient that the "plane" hit the only part of the building that was under repairs and had been for some time.

Posted by: SimonC2016 May 15 2016, 12:51 AM

Check out the David Icke website, tinfoil hats at the ready!