[ Outline ] · Standard · Linear+ Gnappster, The Ayatollah of Rye and Cola

the 411 section seems like a huge sausage party so far, so I thought I'd jump right in.

I joined RMM in I think July 04 after browsing its goodness for a couple months. I started posting on the message board when I saw the funny shit that went on in here. There wasn't a lot of pic posting in here back then, just funny and sometimes sexy dialog. So I was hooked from the start.

I'm 28 years old and happily married. I know, I know, that probably disapoints the thousands of female members out there (and some of the guys). And if you believe that, I've got some prime swampland in Florida to sell you. I just love breasts and the female form. Sure it's all sexually appealing. But the female body is just so aesthetically pleasing, one just can't help but to stop and admire it, as corny as that sounds.

I went to university and got a degree in sculpture where I specialized in stone sculpture. But being as there isn't a huge job market for a novice sculptor, I got a job as graphic designer for an automotive graphics company, cuz it pays the bills a little better.

I'm into ultimate fighting and fitness and almost any outdoor activity like camping, canoeing, hiking with my dog, or sex(not with the dog).

I like hanging out with friends and drinking a few cold beers, and am pretty easy going at most times.

That's about all I can think of right now, if I think of anything really clever or interesting I'll post it as it will be the complete opposite of what I have so far.

Here's a couple of recent pics of me from the past weekend.

gnappy, i knew i loved canadia for a reason... and now i know what it is... for everyone else out there, i swear this is true...

Group sex among consenting adults is neither prostitution nor a threat to society, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on Wednesday as it lifted a ban on so-called "swingers" clubs.

In a ruling that changes the way Canadian courts determine what poses a threat to the population, the top court threw out the conviction of a Montreal man who ran a club where members could have group sex in a private room behind locked doors.

"Consensual conduct behind code-locked doors can hardly be supposed to jeopardize a society as vigorous and tolerant as Canadian society," said the opinion of the seven-to-two majority, written by Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin.

Lawyers for Labaye and the owner of another Montreal swingers' club argued that consensual sex among groups of adults behind closed doors was neither indecent or a risk to society.

The Supreme Court judges agreed.

"Criminal indecency or obscenity must rest on actual harm or a significant risk of harm to individuals or society. The Crown failed to establish this essential element of the offense. (Its) case must therefore fail," McLachlin wrote.

In indecency cases, Canadian courts have traditionally probed whether the acts in question "breached the rules of conduct necessary for the proper functioning of society." The Supreme Court ruled that from now on, judges should pay more attention to whether society would be actively harmed.

This seemed to ensure there could be no repeat of Labaye's original conviction for causing "social harm" by allowing degrading and dehumanizing group sex to take place.

Social conservatives said the ruling could contribute to a general relaxing of indecency standards.

"The court is essentially saying that fairly public sexual acts can be tolerated in commercial establishments," said Janet Epp Buckingham of the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada.

The judges said that just because most Canadians might disapprove of swingers' clubs, this did not necessarily mean the establishments were socially dangerous.

"The causal link between images of sexuality and anti-social behavior cannot be assumed. Attitudes in themselves are not crimes, however deviant they may be or disgusting they may appear," the judges said, noting no one had been pressured to have sex or had paid for sex in the cases before the court.

"The autonomy and liberty of members of the public was not affected by unwanted confrontation with the sexual activity in question," they said.